The IPKat

JANUARY 17, 2024

The book that is going to change copyright law? After the referrals in Mio [IPKat here and here ] and USM Haller [IPKat here ] , another referral asking about the meaning of originality in EU copyright law has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it is the referral from Romania in Institutul G.

Derivative Work 137

Derivative Work Editing Copyright Music 137

IIPRD

MARCH 1, 2023

[Image Sources : Shutterstock] As per the intellectual property regime in India, this right to monetary gains is not exhausted upon the selling of the artwork by the artist; rather, he/she is entitled to a certain amount or royalties upon every resale of the artwork. The Copyright Act, 1957 2. Rethinking Copyright and Personhood.”

Artwork 98

Artwork Intellectual Property Journalism Copyright 98

The IPKat

JUNE 17, 2023

“ Perhaps I’ll be remembered in history as the banana imbecile ”, summed up provocative and uber-creative artist Maurizio Cattelan in a recent interview with Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera. Of course, that is not all: Comedian has in fact also sparked litigation in the USA.

Copyright Infringement 143

Copyright Infringement Copyright Art Artistic Work 143

SpicyIP

AUGUST 2, 2021

Starting off with the copyright exceptions, she writes about how the Standing Committee Report views the exception to infringement under Section 52 as widely scoped and detrimental to the publishing industry and authors. India’s Accession to the Locarno Agreement: Amendments to the Design Rules, 2001 & Other Impacts.

Reporting 116

Reporting Designs Design Copyright 116

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2024

1] The Copyright Act protects certain types of works, which are included in Section 13. 13 (1) states that original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works as well as cinematograph films and sound recordings are protected by copyright.

Cinema 79

Cinema Copyright Blogging Registration 79

IIPRD

AUGUST 11, 2023

This makes it difficult for the creator to control the dissemination of their works. According to the well-settled laws of copyright, it is a blatant mutilation of the rights of an author over their works and the characters they have developed. 3d 1004, 1021, 1022 (2001). [3] 1] SaikōSaibansho [Sup. Napster, Inc.,

Art 52

Art IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s case law concerning the fair-use doctrine. 102(a)(5) , a category that is defined to include photographs, 17 U.S.C. Feist Publications, Inc. 340, 352-54 (1991).]

Fair Use 95

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 95