The IPKat

NOVEMBER 14, 2022

a wise cat that care about environment kindly provided in CC0 Public Domain license by Pixhere.com) Having to make a selection among the many topics covered, this GuestKat finds it interesting to note that during the conference the EPO case G2/21 on 'plausibility', was repeatedly discussed from different angles.

IP 76

IP Marketing Marketing Confidentiality 76

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

Initially, neither the 1992 Law on Trademarks, Service Marks and Designations of Origin , nor the 1992 Patent Law , had provided that putting patented or trademarked goods onto the market within Russia exhausted IP rights. The picture in the upper middle is by Amin and is licensed under the Cretive Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

IP 132

IP Branding Brands Branding 132

IP and Legal Filings

JUNE 27, 2022

Benefits of protecting industrial designs includes- monetary gains, unique selling propositions, positive image of a company in the market, in case the design so created is not profitable, same can eb sold to a third party. And anyone who violates the provisions of this statute is liable to pay a sum of Rs.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Designs Design 52

IIPRD

JANUARY 23, 2023

It further expanded its domain as a manufacturer by establishing a market for its self-made products such as kindle for e-book services, audiobook and ‘cloud computing’ web storage services. Patent are valid for the duration of 20 years before coming into public domain) Patent infringement can occur in two ways.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Cease and Desist IP 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 13, 2023

2001), the court found that: if the promise [in a contract] amounts only to a promise to refrain from reproducing, performing, distributing or displaying the work, then the contract claim is preempted. Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. In Wrench Ltd. Taco Bell Corp. , 3d 446 (6th Cir.

Blogging 82

Blogging Copyright Contracts Cease and Desist 82

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Addressing Factor 4, it asserted there was little or no market harm, because “time-shifting merely enables a viewer to see … a work which he had been invited to witness in its entirety free of charge.” ( Id. Arguably little to no market harm, at least not until remote controls and commercial-skipping became popular.)

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Blogging Licensing 97