IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 30, 2023

Within Metaverse, patents must be handled in accordance with three verticals: First, patents for the Metaverse technology itself, which may be further broken down into the hardware and software technologies required to create a distinctive and customized Metaverse. because it is not possible to patent the Metaverse as a whole.

Intellectual Property 88

Intellectual Property Non-Fungible Tokens Trademark Copyright 88

The IPKat

OCTOBER 19, 2022

At its core, the case relates to whether the right to file a patent application in the future is covered by the same provisions relating to the right to an existing patent or patent application. An equivalent provision is also included in the Design Directive 98/71/EC.

Designs 67

Designs Design Reporting Registration 67

Patently-O

AUGUST 30, 2021

.” Full Scope Written Description : The Patent Act requires that the specification include “a written description of the invention.” The specification needs to convey that the inventor had “possession” of the claimed invention as of the patent application’s filing date. 35 U.S.C. §

Inventor 131

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 131

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

However, this 2002 decision did not define whether AI technology can be an inventor. But such a non-human inventor can neither be an applicant for a patent nor a grantee of a patent.” United Kingdom: Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat).

Technology 111

Technology Inventor Patent Patent Law 111

Patently-O

MAY 2, 2022

Application of the on sale bar is a question of law as is the underlying issue of whether the experimental use exception applies. The original patent application was filed Feb 9, 2021 –one year and two days later and outside the one year grace period. 2002) (offer to make a “remote database object. Bartell Indus.,

Invention 82

Invention Contracts Licensing Inventor 82

Patently-O

JULY 6, 2022

USPTO (Supreme Court 2022) focuses the question of whether COURTS have power to create non-statutory patentability doctrines. Does the judiciary have the authority to require a patent applicant to meet a condition for patentability not required by the Patent Act? SawStop Petition for Certiorari. Gass’s U.S.

Patent 74

Patent Art Invention Inventor 74

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The judgement was passed in a writ petition filed by Natco Pharma against the Controller’s order granting Novartis a patent for a form of the Valsartan-Sacubitril complex, after conducting a unilateral hearing excluding Natco therefrom. Controller of Patents & Designs Patent Office Mumbai. CCI and Monsanto v.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 27, 2024

The court has noted several factors that support the Applicants’ position. Since the tentative specification date in 2002, the Respondent has refrained from expressing any objections, even subsequent to the launch of the product (Bajaj Pulsar motorbike) onto the market. The idea of presuming the validity of a patent.

Invention 66

Invention Patent Patent Infringement Technology 66

Intepat

APRIL 19, 2023

In other words, copyright does not prevent others from creating a similar software program or user interface, as long as they do not copy the original code or design. As a result, it is apparent that patent law offers a broader scope of protection in contrast to copyright law, which is primarily relied upon by inventors in this field.

Invention 52

Invention Intellectual Property Patent Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2023

§ 1114(1) (Section 32), or “[a]ny person who … uses in commerce any” word, false description, or false designation of origin that “is likely to cause confusion… or to deceive as to the affiliation,” origin, or sponsorship of any goods, id. § § 1125(a)(1) (Section 43). CCS Fitness, Inc.

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52