article thumbnail

Ministry of Commerce and Industry Releases Draft Amendments to the Geographical Indication Rules, 2002

SpicyIP

Three years after the 2020 amendments to the Geographical Indication Rules, 2002 , the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MoCI) published the 2023 draft amendments on October 20, inviting objections and suggestions from the relevant stakeholders.

article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2023

Erik K Pelton

The following is an edited transcript of my video Top Trademark Trends of 2023. 2023 might be considered the busiest year in the world of trademark developments in a long time. The Supreme Court heard a trademark case involving a trademark application for the phrase “Trump too small”, that it has not yet ruled on.

Trademark 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Unveiling Trademark Dilution from Scratch to Denouement

IP and Legal Filings

Frank Schechter which says that a common (Generic) name can be registered by anyone, but no one has the exclusive right to that trademark, For instance, the renowned brand Apple has its trademark registered under various classes but the word ‘apple’ diluted under class 29 of the food category.

article thumbnail

Whose Serve is it Anyway? Assessing the Sun Pharma v. Dabur Finding on the Applicants’ Obligation to Serve Counter-Statements

SpicyIP

Dabur India is the Court’s passing comments on the responsibility to serve the Counter-Statement in trademark prosecution. The Court in passing observes that “… Under Rule 50 of the 2002 Rules, the counter statement is to be served by the Applicant itself and not by the Registrar.

Copying 111
article thumbnail

Gazing Substantive vs Procedural Rights in the Light of SAP Se vs Swiss Auto Products and Anr

SpicyIP

The case revolved around SAP Se (Appellant) trying to furnish new evidence according to the Trademark Rules, 2002. It started trading in India in around 1992 under the mark “SAP” and applied for trademark registration in 1999. The Appellant herein was a software entity providing business solutions for a number of industries.

article thumbnail

Trademarks vs. Generic Terms: Can Generic Terms be Trademarked?

IP and Legal Filings

Can their names be officially protected under trademark laws?At At first, it might seem a little confusing as Trademarks are like- ‘special signs’ that help us know where products or services come from. Trademarks must have a distinguishing capacity and must be ‘distinctive’ in itself. Jitender V. Jain and Anr.,

article thumbnail

Legal Discernment On The Co-Existence Of Similar Trademarks

IP and Legal Filings

Trade Mark Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) defines the term Trademark as “a mark which is capable of distinguishing a product or service of one person from those of others”. [1] The ‘Cycle’ trademark has been domestically and internationally used by the plaintiff since 1954 without anyone’s interruption.