The IPKat
MARCH 22, 2024
This article delves into the saga’s central copyright issues and the concept of moral rights, and compares the situation in the US to how it might have unfolded under EU law. Another significant divergence lies in the recognition of moral rights.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 22, 2024
Mango, in turn, sustained in its defence that (i) as the rightful owner of the physical Paintings, it was entitled to display them in public, and that (ii) the creation of digital works (i.e. Therefore, the moral right of “disclosure” had already been exhausted. an exploitation that caused them no harm).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 23, 2023
On 17 December 2008, the Paris Court of Appeal recognised the infringing nature of the reproduction on display. The date of 17 December 2008 is the starting point for the running of the statute of limitations, even if the infringement had been going on for some time.
SpicyIP
FEBRUARY 24, 2022
About the Organiser: The Centre for Intellectual Property Studies (CIPS), started in 2008 under the aegis of National Law University Jodhpur, aims to update the society and industry on core issues such as the growth in IPR violations, amongst others. Co-authorship is not permitted. Prizes: First Prize: Rs.
The IPKat
JANUARY 17, 2024
A second (revised) edition followed in 2008. In 2017, the Regional Court of Bucharest held that the defendants had infringed the professor’s moral right of attribution. The professor also prepared a Romanian translation of the Latin text. As a result, his estate launched proceedings for copyright infringement.
The IPKat
MAY 9, 2023
In 2008, the parties concluded a contract, which included the following clauses [translation by this Kat]: § 4 Protection of the work and of the author […] 4.3 The architect filed a lawsuit against the mosque’s owner, claiming the infringement of his moral rights under §§ 14 and 39 of the German Copyright Act.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2022
There are difficulties in evaluating whether a pile of toys left on a rug in the living room by siblings preparatory to play-time projects after a day at school is a work of art ( Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch)).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
70 
Let's personalize your content