The IPKat
MAY 18, 2024
Facts Mr T trained as an editor at a film and audiovisual school run by ECAR CAMPUS from 2009 to 2011. In its 2010/2011 student guide, the school's internal regulations stated that “ students grant their school permission to use their work exclusively for educational and non-commercial purposes, to promote the school to the general public ”.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
And who poses moral rights in the work? This chapter also describes the methodology for the qualitative empirical research that involved 20 interviews conducted during 2011-13 with participants from the theatre community including actors, playwrights, directors, and producers. The monograph is presented in six chapters.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 28, 2024
style fair use: South Korea adopted it in 2011 , and it has been considered for adoption by Australia. Copyright Act is an extremely limited right, and fair uses of artworks are explicitly made exempt from attribution requirements. Copyright Office in its 2017 report on moral rights. However, U.S.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2022
The notion of stewardship (H R Howe, ‘Copyright limitations and the stewardship model of property’ (2011) 2 IPQ 183-214) is instrumental to expanding the scope of the analysis on vulnerable authors (e.g. The aim of the research is not to support the enforcement of further boundaries or forms of control on copyright works.
IPilogue
FEBRUARY 25, 2022
Twitch has been featured on the IPilogue in the past (relating to video game copyrights , moral rights in video games , and the European Copyright Directive ) but this case is unique as it involves a different form of copyrighted media: TV shows. Twitch Popularity.
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 19, 2023
Protection Of Personality Rights Under Ipr Although the provisions of the country’s current IPR laws can be used as an indirect reference, the law dealing to such a violation of image rights has not received exclusive recognition under Indian law. In Titan industries v. M/S Ramkumar jewellers, CS (OS) No.2662/2011,
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 31, 2022
Relying on cases like Esso Française SA v Association Greenpeace France , Cour d’appel de Paris 4ème chambre, section A Arrêt du 16 novembre 2005 (which, as an aside, was followed by the Indian High Court at Delhi in Tata Sons Limited vs Greenpeace International & Anr on 28 January 2011 (para.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
62 
Let's personalize your content