2018 Advertising Copying Moral Rights 
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 6, 2023
52(1)(t) and ‘moral rights’ of the author in such work. Lastly, I will discuss the argument of moral rights of the author in contending the ‘fair use exemption’ of their work. As a corollary, it also asserted ‘moral rights’ over the mural under Sec. 166 of Create, Copy, Disrupt). 57 of the Act.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
This first part covers the definition of a work, authorship and moral rights. Parts 2 to 4 will address exploitation rights, related rights, exceptions and limitations, copyright contract law and enforcement. Moral rights (Sections 12-14 UrhG). 4] BGH, 11 May 2017, Die Höhner, GRUR-RR 2018, 61. [5]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP Whiteboard
AUGUST 30, 2020
(Left: Chris Black’s Jarrangini (buffalo), 2018 © Chris Black/Copyright Agency, 2020. Right: Photo courtesy of Katie Hagebols retrieved from [link]. According to 2018 research, one in five Australians has a tattoo. [1] This leads to a number of questions: Is it copyright infringement to copy a work and use it as a tattoo?
IP and Legal Filings
JANUARY 22, 2024
Before the digital era, copyright protected tangible art or works, allowing authors to easily regulate usage, copies, and earnings. Secure Distribution is a means of distributing digital content using encrypted codes which prohibit copying and limits the number of devices a product can be accessed from.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
The defendant in that case had offered adapters for sale which enabled Nintendo games, that had been produced by third parties in circumvention of copy protection measures and downloaded from the internet, to be used on the Nintendo games console. Injunctive relief (Section 97(1) UrhG) and cease and desist agreements.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
If memes are so powerful to engage users with the underlying content, as recognized by their increased use as an advertising tool, then how can the same corporations claim that memes are creating a serious harm that the law should recognize and protect? Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v]
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 30, 2023
The dispute arose because Oppo did not pay royalties to Nokia for using its SEPs after the expiration of their agreement in 2018 and went on to sell their handsets using Nokia’s SEPs in India. HULM Entertainment v. The above understanding was relied upon by another Division Bench in Google LLC v. Makemytrip (India) Pvt.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
49 
Let's personalize your content