SpicyIP

DECEMBER 6, 2023

2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. 52(1)(t) and ‘moral rights’ of the author in such work. 52(1)(t); and (ii) if yes, whether the proviso of the same or ‘fixation requirement’ excludes it from the scope of fair use. As a corollary, it also asserted ‘moral rights’ over the mural under Sec.

Moral Rights 49

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Artistic Work 49

IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 22, 2024

The crux of this debate is the argument that if the theft of restricted digital content is for the purpose of knowledge and research, it should be considered as an act done under ‘fair use’ and ‘fair dealing’ of the content. Digital Rights Management & Fair Use If everything is so well designed, then where is the issue?

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Fair Use Intellectual Property 52

JIPEL Copyright Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. infringement of the creator’s exclusive right to reproduce and/or prepare a derivative work) or VARA/moral rights (i.e.,

Moral Rights 52

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Social Media 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 10, 2023

13, 2018) Come to think of it you, you may also recall a California case holding VARA did not apply to graffiti comprised of large scale murals on the exterior of San Francisco’s oldest continuously operating queer bar, The Stud. Copyright Act is the primary section that grants rights to visual artists. G&M Realty L.P.

Social Media 52

Social Media Art Fair Use Moral Rights 52

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

Topics include access and substantial similarity, fair use, performers’ rights, moral rights, expert testimony, the role of lay listeners, sound sampling, as demonstrated in dispositions of litigated and settled infringement disputes.

Intellectual Property 67

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Registration Editing 67

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v] iv] Maxwell L. Stearns, Todd J.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

Kluwer Copyright Blog

SEPTEMBER 1, 2021

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit rejected Jeff Koons’ fair use argument ( section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976 ) based on parody ( Rogers v. Moulinsart, the Belgian company that holds the rights to Tintin, and the heir of the author, Hergé, holder of the moral rights, brought a copyright infringement case against Marabout.

Derivative Work 106

Derivative Work Copyright Law Copyright Law 106