Remove 2022 Remove Advertising Remove Designs Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

SA-22-CV-00096-XR, 2022 WL 17086368 (W.D. 18, 2022) Lexmark provides standing to a purchaser because the harms it alleged are “commercial” harms. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived. AHBP LLC v.

article thumbnail

false advertising doesn't get around Dastar without some direct statements

43(B)log

Wolf Designs LLC v. Five 18 Designs LLC, F.Supp.3d 3d -, 2022 WL 10551564, No. 18, 2022) Wolf designs and installs “vehicle wraps,” large vinyl graphics or decals applied to car bodies. Copyright: Three of Wolf’s customers allegedly opted to hire Five 18 to install vehicle wraps featuring designs Wolf owned.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. Also, there should not be a “use in commerce” when the advertiser (here, Troia) doesn’t actually offer any goods or services in the marketplace. Troia , 2022 WL 3544170 (S.D.N.Y. 2022 WL 3647817 (E.D.

article thumbnail

Falsely advertising "ghost guns" as legal in NY is actionable

43(B)log

23, 2024) The AG sued sellers of “unfinished frames and receivers” — also known as “80% lowers” or “receiver blanks” —designed to evade restrictions on gun sales. Lawmakers in New York City and New York State banned the sale of unfinished frames and receivers in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Arm or Ally, LLC, 2024 WL 756474, No.

article thumbnail

Noncommercial speakers can be liable for contributory false advertising

43(B)log

Pacifici, 2022 WL 889275, No. 25, 2022) I know it probably seems sometimes like I approve of every expansive use of false advertising law, but sometimes even I find an aggressive position to go too far. ExeGi Pharma, LLC v. 1:21-CV-2134-TWT (N.D.

article thumbnail

antitrust claim against Suboxone, including false advertising, survives summary judgment

43(B)log

16-5073, 2022 WL 3588024 (E.D. 22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to false advertising difficult.

article thumbnail

Amazon escapes liability for its Brand Registry advertising

43(B)log

21, 2023) Deetsch alleged that he owned design patents for CPAP pillow products, which the Lei defendants infringed. They also allegedly used Deetch’s image in ads and on packaging, and allegedly falsely claimed on Amazon that their pillow products “were designed in the United States but are manufactured in China.”