2022 Artistic Work Artwork Ownership 
Intellectual Property Law Blog
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship ( Thaler v. Thaler included several new legal theories to suggest that his contribution to the Creativity Machine, such as his ownership and prompting of the software, would establish a human component of authorship.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022
NFTs are units of data stored on a blockchain that signify ownership of (supposedly) unique digital media items. On September 8, 2022, the parties filed a notice of settlement. Rakoff’s May 18, 2022 order denying Mason Rothschild’s motion to dismiss Hermès’ trademark claims. Miramax, LLC v. Nike, Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 3, 2023
Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship ( Thaler v. ” The application asserted that the work was created autonomously by the machine and listed the machine as the author. ” Where AI alone creates a work, this point seems clear.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 17, 2023
Image from DALL-E 3 Introduction Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. More and more AI systems offer services that push users’ production capacity for new literary and artistic works beyond unforeseen barriers. ChatGPT , Smodin ), to perform music (i.e.,
Kashishipr
AUGUST 17, 2022
Content creators and social media influencers work sincerely to build their reputation for expertise in specific industries, products, and topics. As per a report, influencer marketing investment is expected to reach $15 billion in 2022. It currently accounts for about 15% of the entire revenue spent on global advertising.
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 3, 2023
This issue is often discussed in connection to section 9(3) of the Copyright Design and Patents Act (UK) , (CDPA) which provides that in the case of an artistic work which is computer-generated, the author shall be taken to be the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
A third reflection emerges: undoubtedly, Warhol’s work was created based on Goldsmith’s. However, it is important to recognize that all artistic works are influenced by those that came before them. [1] Lumen Juris, 2022. A film based on a book serves as an example. 1] CAMPOS, Pedro de Abreu M., CAMPOS, Pedro.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
147 
Let's personalize your content