43(B)log

APRIL 18, 2023

12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on false advertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in false advertising cases. Plus, they hadn’t removed existing false advertising from their social media accounts. and] expects to complete.

False Advertising 72

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Social Media 72

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

2022 WL 17218077, No. 2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s false advertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. However, they fail to show that Monster dirtied its hands to make the false advertising claims now alleged against Defendants.” Monster Energy Co.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Social Media 59

43(B)log

JUNE 15, 2022

2022 WL 1599712, No. 19, 2022) The parties compete in the market for energy drinks. Monster alleged that VPX falsely advertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Contracts 59

The IPKat

JUNE 13, 2022

Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. There have also been complaints where creators have tried to NFT their own creativity but by doing so have breached a contract.

Non-Fungible Tokens 140

Non-Fungible Tokens Advertising Advertising Ownership 140

43(B)log

MARCH 4, 2022

Tito & Tita Food Truck, LLC, 2022 WL 622234, No. 3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage social media advertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. Pan 4 America, LLC v. DLB-21-401 (D.

Social Media 72

Social Media Advertising Advertising Business 72

43(B)log

APRIL 26, 2022

2022 WL 912890, No. Nor did an arbitration provision in contracts for advertising after May 2018 defeat adequacy and typicality. DZ Reserve v. Meta Platforms, Inc., 3:18-cv-04978-JD (N.D. This was enough for reliance for UCL standing purposes.

Advertising 66

Advertising Advertising Social Media Contracts 66

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124