Remove 2022 Remove Designs Remove False Advertising Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

antitrust claim against Suboxone, including false advertising, survives summary judgment

43(B)log

In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride and Naloxone) Antitrust Litig., 16-5073, 2022 WL 3588024 (E.D. That difficulty is not really unique, but the court is forced to make distinctions because of the unwarranted exclusion of many false advertising claims from antitrust consideration.) 3d -, MDL NO.

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. ” Following mid-2000s cases like Lamparello and Lucas Nursery , we rarely see such unforgiving anti-griper opinions that twist the Lanham Act to cover circumstances it was never designed to cover. 2022 WL 3647817 (E.D.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

two opinions send "false advertising of certification mark" claim to jury

43(B)log

2022 WL 898598, No. 28, 2022) Take it away, Judge Altman: If you want to build with plywood in the United States, you generally need a certification— called a PS 1-09 stamp. pictures of not-good plywood from case Plaintiffs alleged both direct and contributory false advertising. 2022 WL 953150, No. Google, Inc.,

article thumbnail

4th Circuit upholds contempt ruling in false advertising case: scrub your website and FB account!

43(B)log

4th -, 2022 WL 2036293, No. 7, 2022) The court upheld a contempt finding based on an underlying false advertising claim. The court noted that “the search terms that yielded the Letter (‘vsl3 litigation’) were basic—the product’s name and a major event surrounding it. De Simone v. VSL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Clone wars: truthful statements about cloned horses don't constitute false association

43(B)log

Meeker, 2022 WL 6507718, NO. 19, 2022) Judge Cannon has done some other stuff, too. Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss. La Dolfina S.A., 20-82231-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart (S.D.

article thumbnail

how detailed must pleading be to link falsity with lost sales?

43(B)log

2022 WL 2383722, No. 28, 2022) BD and its subsidiary (BD) sell urologic devices and supplies, including catheter trays, which compete with Medline’s. The parties are involved in related patent litigation. Becton, Dickinson & Co. Medline Indus., 21-12929 (D.N.J. The allegations were sufficient to state a Lanham Act claim.

article thumbnail

"objectively baseless" patent infringement claims can constitute tortious interference/defamation

43(B)log

8:22CV314, 2022 WL 15523245 (D. 27, 2022) A rare tortious interference/business defamation case that results in a preliminary injunction (converted from a TRO), based on claims of patent infringement made to plaintiff’s customers. The litigation privilege did not extend to making baseless claims about infringement.