Remove 2022 Remove False Advertising Remove Licensing Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

crypto lender plausibly violated UCL via unlawfulness and deceptiveness

43(B)log

2022 WL 3590329, No. 22, 2022) Nexo’s Crypto Credit service allows users to take out loans against cryptocurrency collateral. The false advertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., Clients retain 100% ownership of their digital assets.

article thumbnail

Clone wars: truthful statements about cloned horses don't constitute false association

43(B)log

Meeker, 2022 WL 6507718, NO. 19, 2022) Judge Cannon has done some other stuff, too. This case concerns major players in the world of professional polo, their efforts to produce and clone genetically superior horses, and the ownership disputes that have arisen from those efforts.” La Dolfina S.A.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

truthful statement about role in developing product isn't falsified by later split

43(B)log

2:21-cv-830-SPC-MRM, 2022 WL 1187136 (M.D. 21, 2022) “Nearly twenty years ago, Plaintiff Dr. Andrew Hawrych, a plastic surgeon, and Defendant Peter Von Berg, a businessman operating a cosmetics and skin care company, formed an oral agreement to develop new cosmetic products.” Thus, the false advertising claim would be dismissed.

article thumbnail

1202 and Lanham Act claims can't save lawsuit against embedding photos

43(B)log

2022 WL 14813836, No. 25, 2022) Logan alleged that Facebook’s embedding tool enables third parties to infringe his copyrighted photos uploaded onto his Facebook account by embedding them to third-party websites and allowing embedding on Facebook from other websites, creating both direct and secondary liability. Meta Platforms, Inc.,

article thumbnail

literal falsity of claim that website doesn't allow checkout in under a minute supports preliminary injunction

43(B)log

DealMaker alleged that defendants stole its trade secrets and also alleged violation of state and federal false advertising law. Challenged claim: DealMaker’s customers do not retain ownership over their own data. DealMaker noted that Issuance’s own terms include a provision that allows Issuance to license its data.

article thumbnail

False CMI isn't plausibly related to consumers' decisions to buy/watch TV show

43(B)log

2022 WL 18278580, No. 22, 2022) Interesting Dastar case thrown up by Westlaw. False advertising: Sybersound Recs., It’s not enough to allege that a defendant provided false information about the copyright owner without the resulting inducement etc. Copyright ownership information is CMI. Livn Worldwide Ltd.

article thumbnail

Ten things to know about NFTs

The IPKat

Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. For example, the owners of the famous “ Grumpy Cat ” meme licensed the use of the name, image and likeness of the cat – and successfully enforced these rights.