Remove 2023 Remove Article Remove Derivative Work Remove Licensing
article thumbnail

No Free Use in the Purple Rain – U.S. Supreme Court Finds License of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” Infringes Photographer’s Copyright

LexBlog IP

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. scholarship, or research” [2] and is evaluated through multiple factors.

article thumbnail

How Original! The Oscars and the Craft of Derivative Works

Trademark and Copyright Law Blog

In addition to the Oscar contenders, the majority of 2023’s highest grossing films , from Across the Spider-Verse to The Super Mario Bros Movie , were based on preexisting IP and adapted for the big screen. One aspect of copyright law that makes adaptations attractive is derivative works. How has this come to be? In Yonay v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Generative AI: Remunerating the human author & the limits of a narrow TDM Exception

Kluwer Copyright Blog

From the output side, the relevant issues are whether the output is copyright-protected, and whether it infringes the copyright of ‘works “ingested” during the training stage of the AI system’ ( see Quintais, here ; see also here and here ). However, TDM for commercial purposes under Article 4 may be opted-out ( see here ).

article thumbnail

What Goldsmith Means to AI Trainers

IP Intelligence

1258, (2023). Warhol created these silkscreens from a photograph of Prince taken by Lynn Goldsmith, who claimed copyright infringement when the Warhol estate licensed Orange Prince to Conde Nast after Prince’s passing in 2016 to illustrate an article about Prince’s life and music. Goldsmith , 598 S.

Fair Use 105
article thumbnail

Some Thoughts on Five Pending AI Litigations – Avoiding Squirrels and Other AI Distractions

Velocity of Content

This article was originally published in The Scholarly Kitchen. It is somehow different from the right to make transformative derivative works (where the word “transformed” is used in Section 101 ) such as film adaptations of books, which clearly require copyright owner consent. GitHub Inc.,

article thumbnail

Court to Revisit Fair Use in Tattoo Infringement Case

Copyright Lately

.” Focusing on the tattoo itself, defendants argue that “[t]he specific challenged use—a non-commercial tattoo hand-inked on the arm of Kat Von D’s friend—is nothing like the copyrighted use, a photograph licensed to be used in a magazine article about Miles Davis.”

article thumbnail

Let’s Go Hazy: Making Sense of Fair Use After Warhol

Copyright Lately

In a 7-2 decision , the Court ruled that the commercial licensing of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” to Condé Nast to illustrate a story about the late musician shared “substantially the same purpose” as the original Lynn Goldsmith photo from which Warhol’s silkscreen was derived, and therefore weighed against fair use. Goldsmith.