LexBlog IP

MARCH 5, 2024

The Guidance, for USPTO examiners and applicants, addresses inventorship and the use of AI, including generative AI, in the inventive process. The Guidance provides illustrative examples in which AI systems play different roles in the inventive process, to show how the USPTO will analyze inventorship issues.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 52

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its much anticipated Inventorship Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions (“Guidance”). [1] 1] The Guidance is retroactive, meaning it applies to all patent applications and issued patents filed before, on or after February 13, 2024. In Thaler v. 4] Based on U.S. 4] Based on U.S. 6] Section IV.A

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Designs 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

The USPTO released inventorship guidance on February 12, 2024, for inventions assisted by artificial intelligence (AI). The Federal Circuit previously held that an AI system cannot be listed as an inventor in Thaler v. Simply owning or overseeing an AI system used in the creation of an invention. Vidal , 43 F.4th

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 15, 2024

On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued guidance on the patentability of inventions developed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, saying that a human must have made a “significant contribution” to the invention.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 52

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 13, 2024

The updated EPO Guidelines for Examination will enter into force on 1 March 2024. The main updates this year reflect the recent decisions from the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) in G2/21 (Evidence standard for inventive step/plausibility) and G 1/22 (Entitlement to priority). A draft version of the Guidelines can be previewed here.

Invention 70

Invention Art Inventor Designs 70

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 26, 2024

The Guidance aims to clarify how patent applications involving AI-assisted inventions will be examined by patent examiners, and reaffirms the existing jurisprudence maintaining that only natural persons, not AI tools, can be listed as inventors. The USPTO is seeking public feedback on the Guidance, which is due by May 13, 2024.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 52

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2024

By Kevin Preji On 28th Feb, 2024, the Delhi High Court in Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in allowing an appeal, clarified the role of the ‘person skilled in the art’ (‘PSITA’) in determining non-obviousness.

Invention 111

Invention Art Designs Design 111

The IPKat

MAY 20, 2024

Comments are due by 29 June 2024. Tian Lu updated readers on the fate of the DABUS patent applications in China, where the invalidity of the patent application was recently upheld on the grounds that an ‘AI system’ cannot be defined as the inventor. Details here.

Invention 62

Invention Art Patent Application Inventor 62

The IPKat

MAY 19, 2024

Comments are due by 29 June 2024. The international standards for patentability require that an invention is novel and inventive in view of the prior art. Brave new world Alternatively, AI could be thought of as akin to a natural phenomena, from which isolating a chemical or structure may be considered an invention.

Patent 62

Patent Art Invention Patent Law 62

Patently-O

APRIL 21, 2024

2024), gives me pause to consider more general eligibility issues of AI Inventions. When does the design or creation of AI system elements qualify as an eligible invention? Therefore, that limitation could not supply the inventive concept required to transform the claims into patent-eligible subject matter.

Invention 71

Invention Technology Patent Drafting Patent 71

Patently-O

MARCH 18, 2024

The patent at issue, originally naming a single inventor (Steve Campbell), claims a lightweight intermodal container system for transporting refrigerated gaseous fluids. The district court agreed, finding their contributions were significant to the conception of the claimed invention. Tube-Mac Indus., Campbell , No. 2022-2170 (Fed.

Patent 58

Patent Inventor Patent Infringement Designs 58

IPilogue

APRIL 22, 2022

The doctrine of equivalents prevents parties from circumventing literal infringement by making minor variations to a patented invention. For example, a patent could describe a bike with two wheels (bicycle), three wheels (tricycle), or four wheels (quadracycle) and then only claim the two-wheeled design. Doctrine of Specific Exclusion.

Patent 120

Patent Settlement Invention Inventor 120

Patently-O

APRIL 30, 2024

You might consider a technical paper from a conference which sketches out a conceptual gearbox design (but omits specific gear ratios and material specifications). That claim requires too much follow-on research work and so does not sufficiently disclose the invention.

Art 110

Art Invention Patent Application Publishing 110

IP.com

MAY 15, 2024

Ever since the invention of the printing press in the 15th century, concerns and policies surrounding the integrity of copyright have evolved to adapt to the new circumstances, and in some situations, policy has evolved to govern the transfer of copyright from one medium to another. Copyright and IP law is not a new issue. LEARN MORE

Technology 52

Technology Invention Copyright IP 52

Patently-O

APRIL 27, 2024

The new rule was announced on April 23, 2024 following a 3-2 vote by the FTC Commissioners (along party lines, with Democrats in the majority). It is set to take effect 120 days later (August 21, 2024). ” Zhaozhao He, Motivating Inventors: Non-Competes, Innovation Value and Efficiency 21 (2023). Chamber of Com.

Patent 68

Patent Confidentiality Business Marketing 68

IP.com

APRIL 30, 2024

Ever since the invention of the printing press in the 15th century, concerns and policies surrounding the integrity of copyright have evolved to adapt to the new circumstances, and in some situations, policy has evolved to govern the transfer of copyright from one medium to another. Copyright and IP law is not a new issue. LEARN MORE

Technology 52

Technology Invention Copyright IP 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 7, 2024

12] Another question that has garnered significant attention relates to the patenting of an invention created by an AI system (and, similarly, the copyright in content created by AI). 13] Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] UKSC 49. [14] 2] Ibid , at para. 3] Ibid , at para. 5; see also paras.

Publishing 52

Publishing Government Litigation Inventor 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 24, 2023

From an in-depth discussion on the terms of copyright and translations in India to the recent UK Supreme Court’s order regarding the patentability of inventions by an AI, we had some engaging posts on this blog this week. The Court directed the NBA to determine whether the invention relates to biological resource with a reasoned order.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Copyright Registering Trademarks 52