Intepat

MAY 29, 2024

.” The “Claiming User Date” category pertains to trademarks that are already in use by the applicant in the market, while the “Proposed to be Used” category applies to trademarks or service marks that are for future use.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Advertising Advertising 52

The TTABlog

JANUARY 17, 2024

Banc of California petitioned to cancel a registration for the mark shown below left, on the ground of likely confusion with its registered mark shown below right, both for, inter alia , banking services. Since both parties rely on issued registrations, priority was an issue in this proceeding. Cancellation No.

Designs 67

Designs Design Registration Service Mark 67

IP Intelligence

JANUARY 4, 2022

If you desire to register a service mark asserting use that is preparatory for the rendering of your services, your application will fail in the U.S. Instead, the services must be actually rendered in connection with the mark for a registration to be granted. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Trademark Advertising 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 4, 2022

If you desire to register a service mark asserting use that is preparatory for the rendering of your services, your application will fail in the U.S. Instead, the services must be actually rendered in connection with the mark for a registration to be granted. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). ” Id.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Trademark Advertising 52

The TTABlog

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

become ordained” or “become a minister,” is strong evidence that Applicant’s consumers will perceive “get ordained” not as a service mark but rather for the commonly understood meaning of the words. Its intent that the phrase function as a service mark is irrelevant. Would you have applied for registration?

Service Mark 76

Service Mark Advertising Advertising Registration 76

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 8, 2022

The examining attorney and the Board refused registration of both versions for failure to function as a mark. The Federal Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that consumers will perceive.SUCKS only as a non-source identifying part of a domain name and not as a service mark.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Designs Design 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 8, 2022

The examining attorney and the Board refused registration of both versions for failure to function as a mark. The Federal Circuit found that substantial evidence supported the Board’s finding that consumers will perceive.SUCKS only as a non-source identifying part of a domain name and not as a service mark.

Service Mark 52

Service Mark Registration Designs Design 52