agencies federal-judicial-center 
Velocity of Content
OCTOBER 20, 2022
Important judicial decisions have been announced and legislative plans have been published in several key jurisdictions. At Copyright Clearance Center, we continue to monitor the copyright landscape as part of our mission to support copyright and licensing around the world. The application will be heard on 28 November 2022.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 12, 2024
The lawsuit was brought by three Plaintiffs: PhRMA, the Global Colon Cancer Association, and the National Infusion Center Association (“NICA”). The court then held that with NICA dismissed, venue in the Western District of Texas would be improper.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 21, 2024
by Dennis Crouch Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the case of In re Chestek that, on its face, simply upheld the USPTO’s requirement that trademark applicants provide their domicile address. After losing at the USPTO, Chestek appealed to the Federal Circuit. Chestek at 8 (Quoting JEM Broadcasting Co.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 13, 2022
The Indian Stamp Act of 1899 defines Stamp Duty as a documentary impost and not a transaction tax, based on the assessed value of a subject (like property) that is due on the amount of the Instrument used for Judicial and Non-Judicial Transactions. they range from Rs. 25000 and different denominations are used for different purposes.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
OCTOBER 4, 2022
Under the public interest factors, Samsung argued that transfer would promote judicial economy since related cases against Google, Amazon, and Apple might be transferred to NDCA. [18] Westport’s arguments centered around the existence of dealerships in the Eastern District of Texas related to MBUSA. defendant (“Holdings”).
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
JUNE 22, 2021
19-1458), a splintered Supreme Court agreed with the Federal Circuit that there is a problem at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), but disagreed about how to deal with it. The case centers around the issue of whether Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) are “principal officers.” Arthrex, Inc. (19-1452); The Opinion.
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022
Meanwhile, several other federal district courts are struggling with how to apportion value in the context of digital marketplace transfers. Nor is it clear whether—or how—NFTs might trigger liability under the 76-year-old federal Lanham Act , which governs trademark infringement and unfair competition. Yuga Labs, Inc.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content