appellate 
JD Supra Law
FEBRUARY 12, 2024
the Appellate Court of Maryland held that customer lists and pricing information constitute trade secrets under the MUTSA, even if such secrets were memorized by defecting employees. As a matter of first impression among Maryland appellate courts, the. In the reported opinion of Ingram, et al. Cantwell-Cleary Co., By: Saul Ewing LLP
JD Supra Law
NOVEMBER 10, 2023
The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed an appeal from the denial of a motion under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) for an ex parte seizure order, explaining that such orders are not final, not effectively injunctive and that the DTSA does not independently provide appellate jurisdiction to review such orders. Lab’ys Inc.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
MARCH 28, 2022
Appellate was complete on September 8, and the court heard oral arguments on September 16. The patent at issue there was granted in 1981, almost 34 years before the appellate decision. As was its right, FPUSA immediately appealed — filing its notice of appeal five days later along with a motion to expedite. Lee , 799 F.3d
IP Law 360
JUNE 30, 2023
The Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules' recent decision, forgoing a mandatory disclosure rule for litigation funding in federal appeals, is prudent, as third-party funding is only involved in a miniscule number of federal cases, and courts have ample authority to obtain funding information if necessary, says Stewart Ackerly at Statera Capital.
JD Supra Law
AUGUST 17, 2023
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that it does not have appellate jurisdiction to review noncompulsory patent counterclaims in a case otherwise unrelated to the originally asserted patents. Teradata Corp. SAP SE, Case No. 22-1286 (Fed. 1, 2023) (nonprecedential) (Lourie, Taranto, Hughes, JJ.).
Patently-O
JANUARY 4, 2023
2022) , highlights some of these issues; although the appellate court ultimately determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The appellate then has the discretion to decide whether or not to hear the appeal. In a split decision, the appellate court held that it lacked appellate jurisdiction.
Patently-O
OCTOBER 12, 2022
Amyris appellate brief at 5. As in injunction order, the Federal Circuit has appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Having lost its appeal, Amyris might consider a motion for rehearing seeking vacatur for lack of appellate jurisdiction and a transfer to the Federal Circuit. 16(a)(1)(B). 16(a)(1)(B).” Philips Corp.,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
65 
Let's personalize your content