Patent Trademark Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2023

Will arguments be necessary in your utility patent application? Nine out of ten utility patent applications will get rejected at least once. So, yes, arguments will be required in the vast majority of utility patent applications. Many will get rejected multiple times. Do not ignore dependent claims.

Patent Application 98

Patent Application Patent Art Invention 98

Kashishipr

OCTOBER 13, 2021

For easing the mode of filing a patent and claiming the subject matter contained therein, there are two basic approaches, namely provisional patent application and complete patent application. What is a Provisional Patent Application?

Patent Application 105

Patent Application Patent Inventor Invention 105

Patent Trademark Blog

FEBRUARY 6, 2023

Focus on what matters most So much can be said, and has been said, about the patent application process. To avoid information overload, let’s get back to the most basic things you need to know to file a patent application. When do you need to patent an idea? Patent deadlines are critical.

Patent Application 98

Patent Application Patent Designs Design 98

SpicyIP

AUGUST 22, 2022

We’re pleased to bring to you a 2 part guest post by Amit Tailor on the question of when a patent application can be divided, that came up in the recent case of Boehringer Ingelheim vs. The Controller. When can/not a Patent Application be Divided? The Parent Application Must have “Plurality of Inventions”.

Patent Application 130

Patent Application Invention Patent IP 130

The IPKat

JANUARY 5, 2022

The EPO Guidelines for Examination require the description of a patent application to summarise the background art ( F-II-4.3 ). This requirement usually manifests with a request from the Examiner for the description to be amended to identify the closest prior art. D8 is a patent relating to a filing unit.

Art 113

Art Patent Application Patent Invention 113

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

On 12 February 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced with a press release the publication of its Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions (Guidance). The guidance embraces the use of AI in innovation and provides that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable.

Invention 83

Invention Publishing Inventor Designs 83

Patently-O

APRIL 8, 2024

By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. The case involved a patent infringement suit over an improved vacuum tube used in radio communications. Background The patent at issue, U.S. General Electric Co. , 571 (1931).

Invention 63

Invention Art Patent Television 63

Patently-O

MAY 25, 2023

2023) The case involving Medtronic and Teleflex centered on five patents related to a coaxial guide catheter used in interventional cardiology procedures. In an attempt to invalidate these patents, Medtronic launched a succession of Inter Partes Review (IPR) petitions. Patent 7,736,355 (“Itou”) could be regarded as prior art.

Invention 71

Invention Inventor Art Patent Application 71

Intellectual Property Law Blog

AUGUST 30, 2021

In recent years, AI patent activity has exponentially increased. The figure below shows the volume of public AI patent applications categorized by AI component in the U.S. However, inventors often need to improve various aspects of an existing AI system to make it fit and work for their applications. from 1990-2018.

Invention 242

Invention Patent Privacy Inventor 242

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 25, 2021

Suppose you and your patent attorney have approved the revised copy of the patent application. It should be filed as fast as possible with the patent office, once that happens. They are based on the following criteria – What stage of invention is your product stuck in? Provisional Application.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Invention Art 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Novelty means that the invention must be new or novel and must not have been anticipated by any published document in the world. In order to prove novelty, it must be proved that no other document in the world has any prior claim relating to the subject matter of the invention. a) Prior Publication [Section 29(1), the Act].

Art 52

Art Invention Public Domain Publishing 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 21, 2024

Inventors and patent practitioners filing patent applications before U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may have an obligation to disclose if artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the innovation process. the Office is aware of and evaluates the teachings of all information material to patentability.”

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Patent 52

The IPKat

NOVEMBER 19, 2022

The recent decision T 0555/18 from the EPO Boards of Appeal considered the burden of proof for unusual parameters relied on for inventive step. The patent in question ( EP2117839 ) related to shrink wrap for use in food packaging. On appeal, the Opponent argued that the patent lacked inventive step. transparency).

Invention 92

Invention Art Patent Patent Application 92

SpicyIP

APRIL 30, 2024

By Kevin Preji On 28th Feb, 2024, the Delhi High Court in Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs in allowing an appeal, clarified the role of the ‘person skilled in the art’ (‘PSITA’) in determining non-obviousness. Subsequently, the patent application was rejected in September 2020.

Invention 111

Invention Art Designs Design 111

Patent Trademark Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2022

What makes for a good utility patent application? Is a good patent application one that avoids rejections ? What if I were to tell you that a utility nonprovisional patent application that gets allowed easily might not always be a good thing? What do you look for in utility patent claims?

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Invention Art 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) may change how we invent: many envision a collaborative approach between human inventors and AI systems that develop novel solutions to problems together. Such AI-assisted inventions present a new set of legal issues under patent law. On February 13, 2024, the U.S. 101 and 115.

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Patent Designs 52

The IPKat

MARCH 24, 2023

In order to understand whether a purported technical effect may be relied on for inventive step, the EBA concludes that the substantive question remains what would the skilled person understand from the application as filed? Although notably, the Opponent's data was also post-published.

Invention 131

Invention Publishing Patent Art 131

IP Intelligence

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released its much anticipated Inventorship Guidance on AI-Assisted Inventions (“Guidance”). [1] 1] The Guidance is retroactive, meaning it applies to all patent applications and issued patents filed before, on or after February 13, 2024. 4] Based on U.S. 101 and 35 U.S.C.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Application Designs 52

Patently-O

NOVEMBER 28, 2023

by Dennis Crouch The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently designated as precedential a portion of its Penumbra v. RapidPulse decision in that provides important guidance on the use of a provisional patent application’s filing date for 102(a)(2) prior art under the America Invents Act. Penumbra, Inc.

Art 49

Art Inventor Publishing Invention 49

Patent Trademark Blog

APRIL 19, 2023

What does patent obvious mean? To be patentable, an invention must be novel and nonobvious. A novel invention is new, unique, something hasn’t been before. But, what makes a patent application obvious? Want to file a nonobvious patent? Who really decides if a claimed invention is obvious?

Patent 98

Patent Patent Application Invention Art 98

Intellectual Property Law Blog

MAY 22, 2023

Enablement Section 112(a) of the Patent Act requires that a patent specification includes “a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making an using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art…to make and use the same.

Invention 246

Invention Art Patent Inventor 246

The IPKat

AUGUST 11, 2023

PatKat has been sceptical about Dr Thaler and his purported inventing machine, DABUS, for some time ( IPKat ). In the pending European DABUS case ( EP4067251 ), DABUS's invention as originally claimed was found to lack novelty in view of 25 year old prior art. Sceptical Kat Has DABUS invented?

Inventor 52

Inventor Invention Law Ownership 52

The IPKat

JUNE 30, 2023

The referral particularly asks whether the non-enabling prior use of a product excludes the composition of the product from the prior art or whether it also excludes the product per se (i.e. so that it can not be used as a starting point for inventive step).

Art 82

Art Invention Patent Application Patent 82

LexBlog IP

MARCH 11, 2024

of the order, the administration charged the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USTPO) with three directives: 1. Accordingly, the USPTO responded to its first directive and issued its Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions on February 13, 2024. [2]

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Intellectual Property Patent 52

Kashishipr

JULY 28, 2021

In the absence of such a doctrine, the true essence of the patent and the monopolistic rights would never be realized to their full potential as it would enable the competitors to make unimportant changes to the invention to claim another set of rights altogether. Brief Introduction.

Patent Application 59

Patent Application Patent Invention Art 59

The IP Law Blog

AUGUST 11, 2022

Arguably, an AI system, which is a non-human, can also create or invent. But can an AI system be a named inventor on a patent? While these systems may have been programmed and/or trained by a human, the human may not have actually invented the apparatus or method claimed in the patent application. Patent Appl.

Inventor 96

Inventor Invention Patent Patent Application 96

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 26, 2024

The Guidance aims to clarify how patent applications involving AI-assisted inventions will be examined by patent examiners, and reaffirms the existing jurisprudence maintaining that only natural persons, not AI tools, can be listed as inventors.

Invention 52

Invention Inventor Patent Patent Application 52

TraskBritt Intellectual Property

MAY 27, 2021

The cost savings of filing a provisional patent application without consulting a professional are certainly tempting. However, such a strategy may ultimately cost more in the long run, including possibly costing valuable patent protection. What is a Provisional Patent Application? Keep Trade Secrets Secret.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Invention Inventor 52

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 20, 2023

Patent strategies should reflect the current legal landscape as well as anticipate potential future legal developments. Part Two of this series covers subject matter eligibility, prior art, and future opportunities. Prior art searches through technical papers may be especially helpful to obtain a more current baseline.

Patent 130

Patent Invention Art Patent Application 130

Larson & Larson

FEBRUARY 13, 2021

A high number of patent applications are given a non-final rejection from the USPTO according to Yale. Often, the reason that the patent office will cite for rejecting an application is the presence of prior art. This makes the term ‘prior art’ an important concept for inventors to understand.

Art 52

Art Patent Invention Patent Application 52

IP Watchdog

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

A major reason for this is that an examiner’s interpretation of a claim drawn to an innovation that may be worthy of patent protection may cause them to determine that the subject matter as claimed is not patentably distinct from the prior art.

Patent Application 128

Patent Application Patent Patent Drafting Invention 128

Patent Trademark Blog

FEBRUARY 15, 2022

Do you need a design or utility patent application? If the appearance (how it looks) is what matters, then a design patent application may be the right type of patent application. If the unique features of your concept are functional or structural, then consider filing a utility patent application.

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Invention Designs 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 28, 2023

However, in a recent case, the Federal Circuit found that a “machine learning” claim element lacked sufficient enablement because both the claim itself and the written description of the patent to which it belonged failed to describe “ how ” the claimed invention implemented this element. ’” Id.

Invention 52

Invention Patent Application Art Patent 52

The IPKat

OCTOBER 21, 2022

The final decision in this referral has the potential to either lower or increase the plausibility requirement in EPO inventive step analysis. In its preliminary opinion , the EBA hedges its bets but hints at accepting a standard of lack of ab initio implausibility for a technical effect supporting inventive step.

Invention 86

Invention Publishing Patent Application Patent 86

LexBlog IP

JUNE 22, 2023

Interesting Patents | Nintendo and Pokémon Company’s New Patent Application by Founders Legal The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) grants hundreds of new patents every week, showcasing developments in technology and innovation. Looking for more information on patents ?

Patent Application 52

Patent Application Patent Intellectual Property Technology 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 27, 2024

This post breaks down the guidelines and walks through some potential strategies for patent applicants. ” Before Graham and the 1952 Act, the courts had ground their obviousness analysis in the statutory requirement of “invention” and the Constitutional purpose to “promote the Progress.”

Art 121

Art Invention Patent Application Patent 121

Patently-O

MAY 24, 2024

This is a major shift in examination practice for design patents so it will be important to watch the developments to see whether the office ramps up design examination. In the decision, the court states: “In applying Graham factor one, the scope and content of the prior art, a primary reference must be identified.”

Design Patent 129

Design Patent Designs Design Art 129