Remove Artistic Work Remove Definition Remove Designs Remove Public Domain
article thumbnail

Evolution of Tests of Creativity in Copyrights

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction Originality in copyright works is the sine qua non of all the copyright regimes of the world. The definition of “ original ” as most people understand it refers to something that has never been done before by any person. The Act, however, omits any definition or methodology for judging a work’s originality.

article thumbnail

Copyright Protection of Modern Art

IP and Legal Filings

The lack of organisation and ambiguity make the protection problematic even if the work is copyrighted. According to section 13 (1)(a) of Copyright Act of 1957 copyright subsists in original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works. The picture was released in Public Domain without permission, which is the issue with this.

Art 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Contradictions of Computer-Generated Works’ Protection

Kluwer Copyright Blog

This thesis is supported by the curious failure of the United Kingdom’s Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act of 1988 ( CDPA 1988 ) to protect “computer-generated works.” However, under no plausible interpretation can an authorless work be original – or an expression of an idea, and thus a work, at all.

article thumbnail

The Much-Adapted “Peter Pan” (1904 – Forever )

Velocity of Content

And the 1911 content reused in these works may actually be in the public domain already. By way of conclusion, I see a number of potential lessons to be drawn from the Case of ‘Peter Pan and the Complex Copyrights.

article thumbnail

Resolving Conflicts Between Trademark and Free Speech Rights After Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. Parody doctrine can apply when a similar mark is used as a designation of source, such as in the Chewy Vuiton case.

Trademark 100
article thumbnail

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights: the USPTO DABUS decision

Barry Sookman

patent statute including the definition of “inventor” which means “the individual or, if a joint invention, the individuals collectively who invented or discovered the subject matter of the invention”. In rendering the decision, the USPTO referred to a number of provisions in the U.S. Unigate Enter., 3d 1169, 1173 (9th Cir. Drosnin, 136 F.

article thumbnail

WIPIP 2022, Session 6 (TM)

43(B)log

Summary of current treatment: Although courts have often referred to “expressive” or “artisticworks as shorthand for the scope of Rogers, they have applied it to speech that quali?es TM bullying w/ a public domain quilt, claiming rights over “Dear Jane” as quilt/software. Mazzuco: a linedrawing problem does exist.