The IP Law Blog

JANUARY 19, 2023

In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Andy Warhol Foundation made fair use of a photo of the late artist Prince. In short, the matter at issue will address when a work is sufficiently transformative to qualify for fair use protection under the Copyright Act. Hetronic International.

Copyright 97

Copyright Trademark Fair Use Contracts 97

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 1, 2023

Supreme Court in June issued a decision involving trademark law. Jack Daniel’s brought trademark infringement claims against VIP Products, a company that produces a “Bad Spaniels” line of dog toys. The Court reasoned that the toys themselves were products, rather than artistic works.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Artistic Work Trademark Trademark Law 40

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 16, 2023

2 on your Tennessee carpet” tarnishes the Jack Daniels trademark. The District Court also held that the fair use exclusion for parodies under the Lanham Act’s dilution provision did not apply where the use at issue does not serve as “a designation of source for the [alleged diluter’s] own goods.” 1125(c)(3)(A).

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Trademark Cease and Desist Designs 130

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 19, 2023

In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether the Andy Warhol Foundation made fair use of a photo of the late artist Prince. In short, the matter at issue will address when a work is sufficiently transformative to qualify for fair use protection under the Copyright Act. Hetronic International.

Copyright 52

Copyright Trademark Fair Use Contracts 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 16, 2023

2 on your Tennessee carpet” tarnishes the Jack Daniels trademark. The District Court also held that the fair use exclusion for parodies under the Lanham Act’s dilution provision did not apply where the use at issue does not serve as “a designation of source for the [alleged diluter’s] own goods.”

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Cease and Desist Trademark Designs 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 16, 2023

2 on your Tennessee carpet” tarnishes the Jack Daniels trademark. The District Court also held that the fair use exclusion for parodies under the Lanham Act’s dilution provision did not apply where the use at issue does not serve as “a designation of source for the [alleged diluter’s] own goods.”

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Cease and Desist Trademark Designs 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 20, 2023

The trademark law provides that the “noncommercial” use of a mark cannot count as dilution. We hold only that it is not ap­propriate when the accused infringer has used a trademark to designate the source of its own goods—in other words, has used a trademark as a trademark.

Trademark 40

Trademark Designs Design Fair Use 40