Intellectual Property Law Blog
JUNE 5, 2023
s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Goldsmith was not paid or credited for this use. 107), “when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material.”
JIPEL Copyright Blog
MARCH 21, 2022
scene in the past, things seemed to come to a head in November 2020 when Nintendo sent a cease-and-desist letter to the Tournament Organizers (TOs) of the Big House, an upcoming streamed Melee tournament, and subsequently forced them to cancel the event. Melee , know this better than anyone.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IPilogue
MARCH 2, 2022
Recently, Hermès has tested out the scope of their intellectual property rights in the metaverse. They seek monetary damages, an injunction to bar the further use of Hermès’ marks, a transfer of Rothschild’s metabirkins.com domain, and delivery of all unauthorized products and advertisements. . Is this Fair Use?
LexBlog IP
JUNE 5, 2023
’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Goldsmith was not paid or credited for this use. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use of a copyrighted work.
LexBlog IP
MAY 26, 2023
’s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Goldsmith was not paid or credited for this use. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides that “fair use of a copyrighted work.
Plagiarism Today
DECEMBER 8, 2022
While parody isn’t protected in the Constitution, fair use was codified into U.S. As the play got closer to opening, the Seuss estate sent cease and desist letters to try and stop it. used nothing from the source material beyond the characters and general plot points, Oh, the Places You’ll Boldly Go!
IP Tech Blog
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
The twists and turns of the case have some fun details, including Plaintiff demanding $10 million from Netflix in a pre-filing cease and desist letter (Netflix declined to pay), but we will focus on the legal issues. Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fair use. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. ,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content