clients written-testimonial 
Plagiarism Today
OCTOBER 20, 2022
Much of what lawyers write have only one or two ways that they can correctly be written, thus it’s common to copy the works of others, especially from one’s own firm or their past work. These are motions filed with the court before jury selection and typically deal with what evidence or testimony will be allowed when the trial begins.
43(B)log
OCTOBER 26, 2021
The most obvious route to proving these cases would be to solicit testimony from the owners as to their reason for breaching their contracts. However, these lawsuits have involved hundreds of timeshare owners, and obtaining testimony from every owner would be a labor-intensive effort. Thus, Sussman got summary judgment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 27, 2021
In the TTAB, trial testimony is submitted via written declarations and by Notice of Reliance, together with any documentary exhibits. In addition, TTAB trial testimony procedure that is specific to opposition and cancellation proceedings may be found in the Trademark Board Manual of Procedure (TBMP).
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 28, 2021
On appeal the second time, the case returned to the same three-member panel (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and STOLL) and the panel has written to “ clarify that it was not our intent to create a heightened requirement for willful infringement.” That standard had not been met and so the district court refused to enhance damages.
43(B)log
MAY 22, 2023
Instead, they responded that “prospective clients have no duty to disclose to the model their reasoning for why the model was denied an endorsement opportunity. It didn’t abuse its discretion in excluding plaintiffs’ proffered expert testimony as unreliable, and there was next to nothing left without that.
LexBlog IP
MAY 20, 2022
As we reported yesterday , the FTC has issued its proposal for an update to the Testimonial & Endorsement Guides. Because the FTC staff has communicated updates to its thinking on testimonials such as via its FAQs , the proposal largely just formalizes what we already know. As expected, this proposal is not a revelation.
IP Tech Blog
JUNE 6, 2021
Prairie Land objected on the basis of work-product and attorney client privilege. Based on Illumina , the Court rejected categorical refusals to allow discovery into design arounds based on work product and attorney client privilege and ordered Prairie Lands to produce all “design modification drawings that appear[ed] on the privilege logs.”.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
237 
Let's personalize your content