companies arthrex-inc 
IP Law 360
NOVEMBER 27, 2023
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has again sided with medical device company Arthrex Inc. in its patent dispute with P Tech LLC, finding as obvious two additional P Tech surgery patents that are being litigated in federal district court.
IP Law 360
APRIL 12, 2023
Supreme Court on Wednesday to reject an argument by Arthrex Inc. Patent and Trademark Office's former interim director could not review decisions on patent challenges, saying the company's position could "cripple" the government. The federal government urged the U.S. that the U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
MAY 1, 2023
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. A skinny-label occurs when a generic drug company seeks approval for a drug with a label that omits the patented indications of the brand-name drug. ” The question in Fall Line is the same as presented in Arthrex II. Travel Sentry, Inc., The held-over cases include: 1.
Patently-O
OCTOBER 27, 2021
Two leading petitions before the court are: American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. Patreon, Inc. , Two petitions will be considered by the court in upcoming days: ENCO Systems, Inc. Ultratec, Inc. The Supreme Court has requested responsive briefing in three additional cases: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Qualcomm Inc.,
Patently-O
SEPTEMBER 20, 2021
Eligibility : The Supreme Court has shown the most interest in hearing American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. There are Am.Axle follow-on cases asking the same questions: iLife Technologies, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc.; VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. Apple, Inc. Patreon, Inc. EMD Serono, Inc. ,
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 19, 2021
In a split 5-4 decision in Arthrex Inc. Smith & Nephew, Inc , the Supreme Court determined that the structure of Administrative Patent Judge (“APJs”) appointments—or lack thereof—was unconstitutional and took it upon itself to restructure the Patent Office’s chain of command.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
JANUARY 4, 2021
Arthrex: The Most Important Case of the Year. In Arthrex Inc. Smith & Nephew Inc.,[1] If the Supreme Court upholds the Federal Circuit’s fix, then, at most, we’re looking at a number of cases decided soon after Arthrex getting rehearing at the U.S. Nike Inc.,[6] Patent and Trademark Office.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content