IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 26, 2023

This is substantiated by the fact that in Deere & Co. Mr. Malkit Singh [29] , the court relied on a previous judgement of Deere & Co. See Generally: Colgate Palmolive v. 63 at paragraph 21 [13] Deere & Company v. 18] Deere & Company v. .:1462270; 18] Deere & Company v. 1462270.

Registration 80

Registration Trademark Trademark Law Law 80

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 17, 2023

The court referred to previous cases such as Pepsi Co. Colgate Palmolive Company v. The court acknowledged that while the law allows a person to emphasize and promote their own goods, they cannot do so at the expense of belittling and denigrating the goods of others. Hindustan Coca-Cola and Dabur India v.

Advertising 74

Advertising Advertising Marketing Marketing 74

SpicyIP

AUGUST 31, 2023

Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. One would argue that the act of calling its perfume to be a version of luxury perfume indicates the intention (as discussed in Pepsi Co. Disparagement: Unfair Advantage and Free Riding, How? Hindustan Coca-Cola Ltd. )

Trademark 111

Trademark Advertising Advertising Branding 111

IIPRD

MARCH 9, 2022

The landmark judgement in this regard is that of Colgate Palmolive Co. Today’s business world is cut-throat and competition drives companies to adopt strategies that might not always be legally or ethically right. It is imperative that companies adopt strategies to protect their products under the ambit of a trade dress.

Trademark 40

Trademark Branding Brands Branding 40