Remove companies cox-communications-inc
article thumbnail

Cox Says T-Mobile Claims 'Flout' Del. Supreme Court Remand

IP Law 360

T-Mobile US Inc. urged Delaware's Chancery Court on Friday to preserve new allegations it levied against Cox Communications Inc.

74
article thumbnail

Anti-Piracy Outfit Rightscorp Hit With $15m Lawsuit After Sale Went Wrong

TorrentFreak

After beginning life as DigitalRights back in 2009, anti-piracy company Rightscorp became known for its cut-price copyright-trolling operations. While some ISPs did indeed forward Rightscorp’s notices, the anti-piracy company couldn’t balance the books with its settlement model and lost millions of dollars. What Does it Do?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Rightscorp Site Triggers Security Warnings and Links to Cannabis Site

TorrentFreak

Backed by the RIAA, several major music industry companies have taken some of the largest U.S. The music companies accuse these providers of failing to terminate the accounts of the most egregious pirates by ignoring millions of copyright infringement notices. The company collected settlements from U.S. Rightscorp Evidence.

Music 142
article thumbnail

Many Fifth Circuit Judges Hope to Eviscerate Section 230–Doe v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The lower court was unpersuaded: “Doe’s negligent design claim similarly aims to hold Snap liable for communications exchanged between Doe and Guess-Mazock.” Why, yes we are: Section 502 of the Communications Decency Act expressly authorizes distributor liability for knowingly displaying obscene material to minors.

Designs 70
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (February 19- February 25)

SpicyIP

Kevin discusses his thoughts on the ability of High Courts to hear rectification petitions in light of the recent DHC order in Hershey Company vs Dilip Kumar Bacha. Clover Centrum vs Clover Network Inc. Addressing the High Court Jurisdiction Vacuum Post-IPAB vis-a-vis Cancellation Petitions under the Trademark Act. Defendant no.3