Remove companies pepsico-inc
article thumbnail

DHC upholds Revocation of Pepsico’s Potato Plant Variety: –

SpicyIP

On July 5, the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal by PepsiCo India Holdings against an order passed by the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority in 2021, thereby effectively revoking Pepsico’s registration of the FL 2027 potato variety. a group company of Pepsi Inc.

article thumbnail

Well Known Trademarks

IP and Legal Filings

For instance, Pepsi has been registered as a well-known trademark of Pepsico Inc., making it the only company that is permitted to register the term Pepsi for any type of goods or services. Even if the service is unrelated to the beverage business, only Pepsico Inc.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex:Product disparagement or nominative fair use?

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction Advertising is an important strategy for a company to sell its products to the customer. To increase their sales, often companies indulge themselves in comparative advertising. The Delhi High Court in the case of Colgate Palmolive Company and Ors vs Anchor Health And Beauty Care Pvt. [i] Dabur India Ltd.

article thumbnail

Can You Trademark A Hashtag?

Kashishipr

For instance, #smilewithacoke and #cokecanpics by the Coca-Cola Company, #McDstories by McDonald’s, and #makeitcount by Nike are the most popularly cited examples. A few examples of existing trademarks bearing the said prefix are #BDOUNIBANK in Class 36 for banking-related services, #SAYITWITHPEPSI in Class 32 by PepsiCo Inc.,

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

Harpic v. Domex Advertisement: Product Disparagement or Nominative Fair Use?

SpicyIP

This is not the first time that these companies have engaged in comparative advertising for the same products as discussed in a previous post. In the case of PepsiCo. Hindustan Coca Cola Ltd. ,

Fair Use 105
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

The second suit was filed by IPRS and PPL against an event management company for broadcasting music without authorization. Narayani Trading Company [Bombay High Court]. SG Worldwide Inc [Bombay High Court]. Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and Kibow Biotech Inc. Sanjay Soya Private Limited v. Meher Distilleries Pvt Ltd v.

IP 143
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

Entertainment Inc., Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Netflix Studios, LLC, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. Controller of Patents and Designs and Raytheon Company v. In another judgement, Raytheon Company v. The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Sequenom, Inc. Warner Bros.

IP 124