Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Samsung Electronics, Co., Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd., Solas OLED Ltd. Samsung Display Co. In March 2021, a jury found Samsung liable for infringing U.S. Samsung Display Co., Samsung moved for judgment as a matter of law and sought a new trial. Solas Oled Ltd.

Litigation 52

Litigation Patent Invention Business 52

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 11, 2023

16] Meaning the mark of a company in braille could only be represented by a certain set of dots embossed on the product in a specific manner. [17] For example, when registered in words, ‘SAMSUNG’ will read ‘SAMSUNG’ independent of the language since every language will still indicate the same meaning, irrespective of the script.

Trademark 82

Trademark Registration Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Law 82

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 23, 2021

i] Merck & Co. Samsung Electronics Co. The Court affirmed that advertisements triggered by third-party trademarks will lead to confusion regarding the origin of the goods and services advertised. Is Google an intermediary? & Anr. Mediplan Health Consulting [425 F. 2d 402]; Intercity Group (NZ) Limtied v.

Trademark 137

Trademark Advertising Advertising Trademark Law 137

The IPKat

JUNE 23, 2022

easyGroup Ltd v Nuclei Ltd [2022] EWHC 901 (Ch) (April 2022) Serial trade mark litigant easyGroup, the vehicle for Sir Stelios to seek to monopolise the word “easy” for travel and just about everything else, received some comeuppance before Mrs Justice Bacon. Hard cheese, decided the judge. Muzmatch has since rebranded as Muzz.

Branding 73

Branding Brands Branding Litigation 73

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

Fish principals Hyun Jin (HJ) In, Ph.D. , Ralph Phillips , and Daniel Tishman explore these growing industries and offer considerations for companies protecting and defending their IP. The lithium-ion battery, introduced commercially in 1991, revolutionized the consumer electronics industry. PDF copy available. Valued at $108.4

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Journalism IP 52

Patently-O

MARCH 15, 2022

Nippon Shinyaku Co. Do you remember Erie Railroad Co. Even in Kannuu Pty Ltd. Samsung Electronics Co. , Nippon Shinyaku Co., In that regard, the company has has requested the Federal Circuit issue an expedited mandate – ordering entry of the Preliminary Injunction to halt the IPRs.

Contracts 80

Contracts Law Litigation Patent 80

SpicyIP

JULY 13, 2023

Image from here [ This post is co-authored with Swaraj Paul Barooah and Anshuman Kar. 1,622), followed by Samsung (1,294), Huawei (849) Microsoft (645), and Ericsson (437). Anshuman, a SpicyIP intern, is a third year law student at National Law University, Odisha.] Additionally, a total of 7,791 applications were filed in other fields.

Reporting 95

Reporting Patent Cease and Desist IP 95

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 23, 2023

Samsung’s defeat on smartwatch faces to go to the Court of Appeal Montres Breguet SA v Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd [2022] EWHC 1895 (Ch) (July 2022) In our last volume , we reported on Samsung being held directly liable as a platform for copied watch faces for Samsung smartwatches. IPKat here.

Registration 76

Registration Advertising Advertising Law 76

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 2, 2022

Huawei Device Co. Defendants Samsung Electronics Company and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Defendants Samsung Electronics Company and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. In doing so, Samsung relied on Chapterhouse, LLC v. Gesture Technology Partners LLC v.

Litigation 52

Litigation Patent Law Technology 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 24, 2022

The basics you know about res judicata (claim preclusion) and collateral estoppel (issue preclusion), but in patent law we have a third and apparent co-equal form of judge-made preclusion known as the Kessler Doctrine. Chemours Co. Samsung Electronics Co., 2022)(forthcoming). Ikorongo Texas LLC, v.

Patent Law 95

Patent Law Law Patent Litigation 95

The IPKat

MARCH 27, 2022

Another House of Bruar employee, Mr Whitfield, ordered a pair of these Heeled Regina boots in May 2017 on the company credit card to be delivered next day to a House of Bruar designer who was involved in the production of the Bruar's 2017/18 catalogue. In April 2017, Mrs Meikle bought herself a pair of Heeled Regina boots. 2) [1997] R.P.C.

Designs 52

Designs Design Copying Art 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 11, 2022

Several other companies have also announced plans to pursue interchangeable status for biosimilar products. Consistent with this, as shown below in Table 2, numerous companies have publicly announced the submission and/or acceptance of new biosimilar BLAs. Samsung Bioepis / Biogen). Samsung Bioepis). Samsung Bioepis).

Litigation 52

Litigation Settlement Patent Marketing 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

three Herceptin ® (trastuzumab) biosimilars, Celltrion’s Herzuma ® , Samsung Bioepis’ Ontruzant ® , and Pfizer’s Trazimera™. Samsung Bioepis). Samsung Bioepis). Samsung Bioepis/Merck). Samsung Bioepis/Merck). SB11 (Samsung Bioepis/Biogen). SB8 (Samsung Bioepis). Neulasta ®. pegfilgrastim-bmez.

Settlement 52

Settlement Litigation Marketing Marketing 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

Reynolds Vapor Company v. and Nippon Shinyaku Co., The most challenged patents relate to aflibercept, held by Regeneron and sold under the trade names Eylea® and Zaltrap®, and tocilizumab, held by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. This request for POP review in Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. Similarly, in R.J.

Reporting 52

Reporting Art Invention Patent 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 14, 2021

Mylan Laboratories Ltd. Beckton, Dickinson and Company , No. Kessler has been on a back-burner for decades, but in 2014 the Federal Circuit revived the case and found that it deserved to co-equal — a preclusion doctrine separate and distinct from issue or claim preclusion. Samsung Electronics Co.,

Patent Law 86

Patent Law Law Patent Licensing 86