Remove companies unified-patents-inc
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Holds Over Two Patent Cases, Considers Two More on Patent Eligibility

Patently-O

Among the three patent cases considered, the court denied certiorari for the pro se case of Wakefield v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. 22-37: This case examines whether FDA-required labeling in a “skinny-label” situation can be considered patent infringement. Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Travel Sentry, Inc.,

Patent 80
article thumbnail

Innovating the Term ‘Inventor’: AI and Patent Law

IPilogue

Recently, AI technology once again exceeded the legal community’s expectations by filing a patent for its invention of interlocking food containers. Under patent law, it is the general expectation that inventors are humans, not robots. Europe, Australia, and South Africa, only Australia and South Africa granted this patent.

Inventor 106
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Attorneys Adam Shartzer and Josh Carrigan Author Law360 Expert Analysis “Patent Fee-Shifting Often Leaves Prevailing Parties Unpaid”

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Principal Adam Shartzer and Associate Josh Carrigan authored Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a fee-shifting statute for patent cases that allows prevailing parties to recover their reasonable attorney fees in exceptional patent infringement cases. A fee-shifting statute for patent cases under Title 35 of the U.S.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

HOW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW CAN SOLVE LITIGATION SURROUNDING THE HATCH-WAXMAN ACT BROUGHT BY THE COURT’S DECISION IN BRAEBURN V. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION

JIPL Online

The Hatch-Waxman Act allows for, among other things, drug manufacturers to piggy-back on the innovations of pioneer companies by allowing submission of a drug application for a drug which is already on the market, but for which the manufacturer has found a new clinical purpose. Background. products.” [xix]

article thumbnail

Guest Post: Third-Party Litigation Funding: Disclosure to Courts, Congress, and the Executive

Patently-O

Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities. [1] Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2] 2] Virtually nonexistent in the patent space in the U.S. Patent assertion finance today is a multibillion-dollar business. [2]

article thumbnail

National IPR Policy : An Analysis

IP and Legal Filings

This article talk about the National IPR Policy which envisages a single platform for all the different types of IPR, for example, patent, trademark, copyright etc. Front legislation that combines and unifies all IPRs under one roof is the National IPR Policy. This indicates that the Indian Patent Act forbids the renewal of patents. [v]

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so we have a fair sprinkling of cases dealing with copyright, patents, trademarks, competition law etc. The second suit was filed by IPRS and PPL against an event management company for broadcasting music without authorization. In H Lundbeck A/S v.

IP 143