Remove Contracts Remove Intellectual Property Remove Privacy Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

Miramax Files Lawsuit Against Quentin Tarantino For Sale Of Pulp Fiction NFTs

IPilogue

In the lawsuit, Miramax alleges several causes of action, including breach of contract, copyright infringement, and trademark infringement. The sale is said to be for a new type of “secret NFTs” with programmable privacy features that allow the owner to withhold certain content from being publicly available.

article thumbnail

Can a Minor Register a Trademark?

LexBlog IP

For example, if the minor may contract, then the minor can file trademark applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) as the “Applicant.” How Is It Possible for Children to Register Trademarks If They Cannot Lawfully Contract? TMEP § 803.01.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

2023 IP Resolutions Start with a Review of IP Assets

The IP Law Blog

As 2023 commences, it’s time for companies to review and take stock of their intellectual property assets. This applies to companies that have never taken serious steps to protect intellectual property and companies that understand the value of intellectual property and take active steps to secure and protect those assets. .

IP 98
article thumbnail

2023 IP Resolutions Start with a Review of IP Assets

LexBlog IP

As 2023 commences, it’s time for companies to review and take stock of their intellectual property assets. This applies to companies that have never taken serious steps to protect intellectual property and companies that understand the value of intellectual property and take active steps to secure and protect those assets.

IP 52
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

This case involved Sun Pharmaceuticals allegedly infringing Cipla’s copyright and registered trademark. The argument of urgency and public interest was held to not have a bearing on the question of trademark infringement and that such a ground could not be a reason to violate the plaintiff’s rights.

IP 143