article thumbnail

USPTO Request for Public Comments Regarding the WIPO Design Law Treaty

JD Supra Law

Over the past two decades, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has been working on a Design Law Treaty focused on aligning examination and procedural guidelines associated with what have historically been referred to as “industrial designs.”

Designs 70
article thumbnail

Looks are not everything… even in design matters.

The IPKat

Determining the informed user and the way the informed user perceives the design of a specific product are important steps in the assessment whether two designs produce the same overall impression. 002138008-0031 for ‘door and window handles’: The design was registered on 27 November 2017.

Designs 57
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Obviousness Test for Design Patents Unchanged

The IP Law Blog

Design patents and utility patents are two different things. Design patents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements. First, they must be novel (i.e., Telflex, Inc.,

article thumbnail

LKQ En Banc Argument Suggests CAFC Could Soften Test for Design Patent Obviousness

IP Watchdog

government and GM Global Technology Operations in a case that could change the test for assessing design patent obviousness. The so-called Rosen-Durling test for design patent obviousness requires that, first, under In re Rosen (C.C.P.A., Next, under Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., 3d 100, 103 (Fed.

article thumbnail

In defense of Rosen references

Patently-O

In one of them, LKQ asked the court to rule that the current primary reference requirement for design patent obviousness, as stated in In re Rosen and Durling v. The panel did not seem convinced that it had the authority to overrule those prior panel decisions and at least one judge expressed doubt that KSR even applies to designs.

Designs 54
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Narrows “Comparison Prior Art” for Design Patent Infringement

JD Supra Law

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art” that may be used in a design patent infringement analysis. Comparison prior art” includes references used to help highlight distinctions between a plaintiff’s claimed design and a defendant’s design that is accused of infringing.

article thumbnail

Copyrightability Of Designer Clothes And Costumes

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction An artist’s ideas, be it for a renowned painting, sculpture, novel, technological design, jewelryor fashion are his own. However, many a times, we witness these designs being copied or recreated. A copyright protection is the ability of a designer to protect his original designs through the copyright laws.

Designs 91