Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 31, 2021

One of the practices that has generated a sizeable number of disputes and rulings is the use of photos to illustrate articles. These three cases address fair use in this context. McGucken moved for summary judgment on the fair use defense. That is unlike the magazine in Monge [v. McGucken v.

Fair Use 129

Fair Use Journalism Licensing Marketing 129

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

A pair of copyright decisions issued in May, one involving the appropriation artist Richard Prince [1] and the other involving works portraying the musician known as Prince, explore and expand on the “fair use” defense to copyright infringement. On May 11, the U.S. 2] A week later, the U.S. 3] Graham v.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2022

Orbison song could be fair use because it transformed the original song by adding something new, with a different purpose, or a new meaning or message. have grappled with how broadly or narrowly to interpret the concept of transformativeness when assessing fair use defenses to charges of copyright infringement.

Fair Use 128

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 128

LexBlog IP

JUNE 2, 2023

The Supreme Court recently upheld an appellate court’s ruling that Andy Warhol’s use of a photograph of Prince as a reference for a collection of screen prints is not fair use – to the extent his foundation decided to license them at least. Goldsmith et al, Case No. Goldsmith et al, Case No.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Licensing 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 4, 2023

A Few Words for a Lost Friend: Tribute to Dmitry Karshtedt (Bob Brauneis, Mark Lemley, Jake Sherkow) Closing Plenary Session: Fair use Robert Brauneis, Copyright Transactions in the Shadow of Fair Use Suppose a work does not infringe another work because and only because it’s been ruled a fair use.

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Derivative Work Copying Marketing 59

JD Supra Law

JUNE 8, 2023

Goldsmith redefines the contours of the fair use defense to copyright infringement. The Court ruled in favor of respondent Lynn Goldsmith, holding that the licensing to a magazine of an Andy Warhol print depicting the recording artist Prince did not constitute fair use of Goldsmith’s photograph on which the print was based.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Copyright Infringement Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 24, 2023

Goldsmith , Opinion located here , the estate of deceased pop artist Andy Warhol argued its use of the photo at issue was fair use under the first of the four Fair Use test factors (the “purpose and character of the use”), because Warhol’s contributions were transformative, adding new expression, meaning, or message.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Copyright Licensing Copying 40

LexBlog IP

MAY 22, 2023

The Supreme Court ruled on May 18 that Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” work of pop art was not a fair use when licensed to Condé Nast in 2016. ” Goldsmith’s photograph was then licensed to Vanity Fair in 1984 for $400 as a “one time” “artist reference for an illustration.”

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Derivative Work Copyright Infringement 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 25, 2023

Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Andy Warhol’s portraits of music legend Prince did not qualify as fair use under copyright law. She emphasized that both uses were commercial in nature, making them substantially similar in purpose. In a closely watched copyright case, the U.S.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Artwork Copyright Law 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fair use. copyright law, the Supreme Court focused on the actual use made, i.e. what the user does with the original work. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Derivative Work Copyright Law Art 52

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] Vanity Fair , in turn, commissioned Warhol to make a silkscreen using Goldsmith’s photograph. He did just that.

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

Plagiarism Today

OCTOBER 11, 2022

1: Justices to Consider Whether Warhol Image is “Fair Use” of Photograph of Prince. Goldsmith, a case that is expected to be a rare moment of the high court ruling on an issue of fair use. Goldsmith sued, saying that this use far exceeded the agreement that they made. Have any suggestions for the 3 Count?

Fair Use 178

Fair Use Reporting Licensing Plagiarism 178

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Yesterday, the Supreme Court held 7-2 that a specific use of Andy Warhol’s “Orange Prince” silk screen—based on a copyrighted photograph of Prince—was not fair use. The first factor did not apply to Warhol’s image as published in Condé Nast in 2016, so that specific use was not fair use.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Copyright Infringement 40

IP Intelligence

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. At the time Goldsmith was also licensing her original photograph to several magazines that were also writing articles about Prince’s life and music. Goldsmith , 598 S.

Fair Use 105

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 105

JD Supra Law

MAY 23, 2023

On May 17th, 2023, the Supreme Court handed down a decision with potentially far-reaching consequences in the evolving landscape of copyright fair use, particularly for commercial works that reproduce copyrighted work. By: Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP

Licensing 52

Licensing Copyright Fair Use 52

Plagiarism Today

OCTOBER 13, 2022

In 1984, Lynn licensed one of her photographs of the musician Prince to be converted into a painting by Warhol for Vanity Fair magazine. However, after Prince died in 2016, it was revealed that Warhol actually made an additional 14 prints using the photograph. 2: Textile Designer Sues Zulily for Copyright Infringement.

Cease and Desist 188

Cease and Desist Copyright Infringement Licensing Fair Use 188

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

In 1984, Vanity Fair sought to license the photograph for an “artist reference” in a story about the musician. Goldsmith agreed to license a one-time use of the photograph with full attribution. The first factor of fair use considers the nature of and reasons for a copier’s use of an original work. [4]

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

JD Supra Law

JULY 7, 2023

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision that the licensing of an image Andy Warhol created of musician Prince (titled “Orange Prince”) based on a photograph by Lynn Goldsmith for use as a magazine cover was not fair use. In the case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. By: Perkins Coie

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 31, 2023

The Court held that the first factor of the copyright fair use test favored respondent photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, rather than petitioner, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (“AWF”). Vanity Fair engaged Andy Warhol to create an illustration based on Goldsmith’s photograph for use in the magazine.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Copyright Editing 52

Velocity of Content

AUGUST 9, 2022

Vanity Fair (magazine) took a license to use and modify the image for its magazine and hired Warhol to use his artistic talents to develop a new image. Goldsmith realized what had happened—that Warhol had made over a dozen works based on her photograph, the majority of which had not been licensed.

Fair Use 98

Fair Use Derivative Work Licensing Art 98

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” At the time Goldsmith was also licensing her original photograph to several magazines that were also writing articles about Prince’s life and music. ” (S.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 52

WIPO Magazine

NOVEMBER 22, 2023

The decision upheld the claim by the celebrity photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, that the Andy Warhol Foundation (AWF) had infringed her copyright in a photo of the late entertainer Prince, when, after Prince’s death in 2016, the Foundation licensed an illustration by Andy Warhol based on that photo, to Vanity Fair for a cover.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Copyright 52

Olartemoure Blog

JANUARY 18, 2023

In 1984, Vanity Fair licensed one of her black-and-white studio portraits for $400 and commissioned Warhol to create a piece for a feature of Prince. He used a cropped photo based on one of Goldsmith’s images to create his artwork. There was no image copyright credit or compensation to Lynn Goldsmith.

Copyright 98

Copyright Artwork Copyright Infringement Fair Use 98

IP Intelligence

JUNE 6, 2023

Sy Damle, (2016-2018 General Counsel) testified that “the training of AI models will generally fall within the established bounds of fair use.” (S. At the time Goldsmith was also licensing her original photograph to several magazines that were also writing articles about Prince’s life and music. emphasis original).

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Licensing Music Art 40

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

OCTOBER 7, 2022

MIP ) magazine recently recognized Fish & Richardson Associate? Managing Intellectual Property ?( Vivian Cheng ?as as one of its 2022 “Rising Stars.” According to?

Intellectual Property 86

Intellectual Property Fair Use Litigation Trademark 86

IP Tech Blog

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fair use. In finding in defendant’s favor, the Court weighed the different factors of the Fair Use Doctrine. Second, the Court found the amount-and-substantiality-of-portion-used factor in Netflix’s favor. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. , Koons , 467 F.3d

Fair Use 62

Fair Use Cease and Desist Social Media Art 62

IPilogue

SEPTEMBER 29, 2021

The series was originally commissioned by Vanity Fair after it bought the license of the photo portrait from Goldsmith. Goldsmith said she was not aware of Warhol’s work until Tribute magazine featured the image, without crediting her, when Prince passed away in 2016. The trial judge John G.

Copyright Infringement 105

Copyright Infringement Copyright Art Fair Use 105

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 5, 2023

s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Goldsmith was not paid or credited for this use.

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Licensing Cease and Desist Derivative Work 130

Velocity of Content

JUNE 15, 2023

“If an original work and a secondary use share the same or highly similar purposes, and the secondary use is of a commercial nature, the first factor is likely to weigh against fair use, absent some other justification for copying.” Fair use is always extremely fact dependent.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Licensing Artistic Work Copyright 52

IPilogue

DECEMBER 13, 2022

In 1984, Vanity Fair magazine received a licence from photographer Lynn Goldsmith to use her 1981 portrait of Prince, which she had shot on assignment for Newsweek. In determining fair use according to the statute, one of the primary points of contention involved the meaning behind the “purpose and character” of the alleged use.

Art 79

Art Fair Use Intellectual Property Licensing 79

LexBlog IP

NOVEMBER 29, 2023

Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fair use. In finding in defendant’s favor, the Court weighed the different factors of the Fair Use Doctrine. Second, the Court found the amount-and-substantiality-of-portion-used factor in Netflix’s favor. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. ,

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Cease and Desist Social Media Art 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 13, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. was entitled to a declaration that Warhol’s “Prince Series” did not infringe Goldsmith’s photo.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 12, 2021

Second Circuit reverses district court’s fair use declaration granted to Andy Warhol Foundation; artist’s works were not “transformative” and could harm the photographer’s market for licensing her image. was entitled to a declaration that Warhol’s “Prince Series” did not infringe Goldsmith’s photo.

Art 52

Art Fair Use Copyright Copyright Infringement 52

Patently-O

OCTOBER 11, 2022

On October 12, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the fair use copyright case of Andy Warhol Foundation, Inc. Andy Warhol admittedly used Lynn Goldmith’s copyrighted photographs of Prince as the basis for his set of sixteen silkscreens. Warhol was never personally a party to the license). 21-869 (2022).

Fair Use 134

Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work Art 134

SpicyIP

OCTOBER 28, 2022

Pocket FM claims to have an exclusive license from Manjul Publishing House, the publisher of translated titles, that holds the Hindi rights to these books. We are not aware of the exact terms of this contract and the specific rights licensed to Pocket FM. The term ‘abridgement’ is not separately defined.

Copyright 126

Copyright Copyright Infringement Fair Use Licensing 126

The Art Law Blog

MARCH 27, 2021

On this reading, there's still no way to have any confidence about how any given fair use case will be decided." That would have been a big deal in fair use jurisprudence. There's no support in the Second Circuit opinion for that second reading, so we're back to the first: these Judges saw this particular use differently.

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Art Marketing Marketing 40

The IPKat

APRIL 4, 2024

Despite this, conversations in the media and some academic circles around the CAB have largely focused on its provisions relating to L&Es, especially fair use (for instance, see here , here and here ).

Copyright 132

Copyright Music Artistic Work Contracts 132