Remove in-defense-of-copyrights-de-minimis-defense
article thumbnail

State Farm’s Nod to Nostalgia Sparks Copyright Clash With Atari

Copyright Lately

Video game publisher Atari Interactive has launched a copyright infringement lawsuit against State Farm, claiming that the insurer improperly appropriated artwork from Atari’s 1983 arcade game “Crystal Castles” for an advertising campaign as part of a “cynical plot” to resonate with fickle millennial and Gen Z consumers.

article thumbnail

Tattoos and Copyright: A Potent Combination

Plagiarism Today

This prompted Alexander to file a lawsuit against Take-Two, claiming copyright infringement of her work. This prompted Alexander to file a lawsuit against Take-Two, claiming copyright infringement of her work. From Three Defenses to One. Alexander is responsible for some of the tattoos on WWE star Randy Orton.

Copyright 202
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Take-Two Tattoo Trial Begins: What You Need to Know

Copyright Lately

In a first-of-its-kind copyright trial, a jury will decide whether tattoo artist Catherine Alexander can effectively control the use of Randy Orton’s likeness in video games. It’s the first ever copyright lawsuit involving the unauthorized reproduction of tattoos in creative content to reach trial. There’s a lot at stake.

article thumbnail

The De Minimis Concept in Copyright Cases – The Ninth Circuit Says What it is and What it Isn’t

The IP Law Blog

Wilmott Storage Services, LLC , decided September 9, 2021, the Ninth Circuit clarified the role that the de minimis concept plays in copyright infringement cases. Copyright Office until 2011. Wilmott argued that it was entitled to summary judgment for, among other things, the defense of de minimis use.

article thumbnail

Copyright case: Bell v. Wilmott Storage Services LLC, USA

Kluwer Copyright Blog

De minimis analysis involves the substantiality of the copying, not the use to which the infringing work is put; by definition, wholesale copying of a protected work cannot be de minimis copying. Case date: 09 September 2021. Case number: No. Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. by Christopher Heath. €

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit: De Minimis Use Is Not an Affirmative Defense for a Copyright Infringement Claim

JD Supra Law

Wilmott Storage Services, LLC, de minimis use of allegedly infringing material is not an affirmative defense against a claim of copyright infringement. According to the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Bell v. By: Newmeyer Dillion

article thumbnail

This Week in the Ninth: City Skylines and Stadium Seating

JD Supra Law

This week, we take a look at Ninth Circuit decisions explaining the scope of the de minimis use defense in copyright infringement actions and clarifying the Americans with Disabilities Act’s requirements for spectator seating.