Remove Law Remove Litigation Remove Patent Infringement Remove Patent Law
article thumbnail

Moderna sues Pfizer for mRNA Patent Infringement: when optics and profits reveal real issues in modern IP law usage

IPilogue

Michelle Mao is an IPilogue Writer and a 2L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Moderna and Pfizer battleā€™s over the inventive process of their respective mRNA COVID-19 vaccines revisit the negative associations of profit, monopolies, and optics in patent litigation. This exposes some concerns about our patent laws.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court on Patent Law: November 2023

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court is set to consider several significant patent law petitions addressing a range of issues from the application of obviousness standards, challenges to PTAB procedures, interpretation of joinder time limits IPR, to the proper scope patent eligibility doctrine. Mangrove Partners Master Fund (No.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Google sues Sonos for Patent Infringement ā€“ Again

IPilogue

Pankhuri Malik is an IPilogue Writer, IP Innovation Clinic Fellow, and an LLM Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. In the latest development in the global patent wars between Google and Sonos, Google has sued Sonos, having filed two suits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on August 8, 2022.

article thumbnail

Book Review: A Practitionerā€™s Guide to European Patent Law (with a discount code)

The IPKat

This Kat is delighted to review ā€œ A Practitionerā€™s Guide to European Patent Law: For National Practice and the Unified Patent Court ā€ (Hart Publishing, 2022, 664 pp.). The book consists of seventeen chapters, mainly on substantive law, but it also addresses certain procedural matters and questions of international private law.

article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court February 2022

Patently-O

Qualcomm had previously sued Apple for patent infringement, and Apple responded with a set of inter partes review petitions. The parties settled the litigation before the IPRs were complete, but agreed that the IPRs could continue. The settlement also included a license to thousands of Qualcomm patents. Alice Step 1).

article thumbnail

Patent Linkage Litigation in China: A Two-Year Review

IP Tech Blog

On June 1, 2021, the Fourth Amendment to the Chinese Patent Law became effective. An important part of the amendment is the introduction by Article 76 of the patent linkage system in China ā€“ a system for litigation of drug patents prior to market entry of generics, similar to that provided by the Hatch Waxman Act in the US.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Patent Law 2023

Patently-O

Although somewhat slow thus far, there is some potential that 2023 will turn out to be a major year for Supreme Court patent law jurisprudence. ” Apple lost the IPR against CalTech’s patent and wants to raise additional defenses in the district court litigation. by Dennis Crouch. Sanofi , No.