Remove pulse courts
article thumbnail

Apple Watch Stays on US Market, But Pulse-Ox Disabled Pending Appeal

Patently-O

The baseline approach in American patent law is that any injunction issued by the district court will stay in effect through the duration of any appeal. So, bottom line here is that the Apple Watch stays on the market, but only if it disables the Pulse-Oximetry functionality.

Marketing 116
article thumbnail

Amici Back Cisco’s Bid for SCOTUS Review of Enhanced Damages Standard

IP Watchdog

Comcast and the High Tech Inventors Alliance (HTIA) filed amicus briefs last week backing a Supreme Court petition brought by Cisco Systems, Inc. The petition asks the Court to consider whether: 1) enhanced damages may be awarded absent a finding of egregious infringement behavior; and 2) whether the U.S. Pulse Elecs.,

Inventor 128
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Masimo tells CAFC that CBP Ruling for Apple Removes Danger of Irreparable Harm

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in a January 15 filing that the Exclusion Order Enforcement Branch (EOE) of U.S. According to the filing, the redesigned watches do not contain pulse oximetry technology, which was the subject of the ITC exclusion order. Masimo’s legal team told the U.S.

article thumbnail

3 Count: USCO Chimes In

Plagiarism Today

First off today, Jaron Schneider at PetaPixel reports that the United States Copyright Office has weighed in on the Andy Warhol case, telling the Supreme Court that they feel Warhol’s paintings were not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photos. Both sides in the case sought an expedited hearing, but the court has refused to grant it.

Fair Use 187
article thumbnail

PTAB Generally Affirms Eligibility Rejections

Patently-O

The PTAB’s general approach is to follow the USPTO’s eligibility examination guidance and then supplement that approach with Federal Circuit and Supreme Court cases. The Board’s analysis directly analogized to Bilski’s patent application which the Supreme Court rejected. = = = =. Ex Parte Ausubel , Appeal No.

Invention 126
article thumbnail

CAFC Vacates TTAB Decision on FLEX Trademark Due to ‘Errors of Significance’

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion that vacated a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) ruling that a trademark registration from GPS vehicle tracking company Spireon was likely to be confused with three trademarks from supply chain management company, Flex LTD. On Monday, the U.S.

article thumbnail

CAFC Clarifies Willful Infringement Standard, Reinstating Jury Verdict and Enhanced Damages for SRI International

IP Watchdog

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential opinion reversing a district court’s denial of SRI International’s motion to reinstate the jury’s willfulness verdict against Cisco Systems, Inc., restoring the district court’s award of enhanced damages, and affirming an award of attorney fees for SRI.