Remove services appellate-litigation
article thumbnail

Court Finds that it would be Inconvenient for Major Multinational Corporation (Microsoft) to Litigate in Texas

Patently-O

states, including Texas, is no stranger to litigation in the Lone Star state. The company’s substantial business activities in Texas, which include marketing, selling, and servicing the accused products, did not significantly impact the 1404(a) jurisprudence in this case.

article thumbnail

Who appeals (and wins) patent cases?

Patently-O

For this particular project, we linked the Federal Circuit dataset to the Stanford NPE Litigation Database, which contains coding on patent asserter types. Decoding Patent Plaintiffs since 2000 with the Stanford NPE Litigation Dataset, 21 Stan. Details about the Stanford dataset are available in Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us?

Patent 137
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Rules to Challenge Patents May Loosen Up

The IP Law Blog

Although a patent can be challenged in federal district court, an IPR is an expedited and less costly procedure than federal court litigation. Thus, an IPR is a useful method for a defendant in a patent litigation lawsuit to invalidate the patent in issue. An IPR is like a mini-trial, as the Board must make a decision within one year.

Patent 98
article thumbnail

Two Mandamus Petitions: Transfer Granted, Improper Service Denied

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch A Federal Circuit panel recently released a pair of mandamus orders dealing with important civil procedure issues – one granting a petition to transfer venue under 28 USC 1404(a) , the other denying a petition challenging substitute service of process for a foreign defendant. Lone Star SCM Systems, Ltd.

article thumbnail

AimJunkies Maintain That Cheating is Legal, Appeals Bungie’s $4.3 Million Arbitration Award

TorrentFreak

“To the best of Appellants’ knowledge, they are the first actually to stand up to Bungie and seek a decision on the merits as to whether ‘cheating’ in computer games is unlawful in the absence of an actual violation of a recognized and existing intellectual property right, such a patents and copyrights,” they write.

article thumbnail

Nitika Fiorella Selected for Delaware Business Times 2021 DBT40 List

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

The list recognizes honorees from across all industries for their leadership, career achievements, and service to the community. Fiorella is a principal in Fish’s Delaware office, where she focuses her practice on complex patent litigation spanning a wide range of technologies. The court ruled in her client’s favor.

article thumbnail

The DTSA Ex Parte Seizure Provision Was Always Bad Policy–Janssen v. Evenus

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The parties are already in litigation. The generic manufacturer is already under a litigation hold. Violating that hold will lead to adverse consequences in the litigation as well as possible criminal punishment. With that context, it is usually unreasonable for one litigant to blindside its opponent with an ex parte demand.