Remove services patent-validity-invalidity-search
article thumbnail

Discretionary Remedies Clarified, and Videotron Ltd Successfully Defends Against Much Litigation-Experienced Rovi Guides Inc.

IPilogue

In Rovi Guides Inc v Videotron Ltd , the Federal Court of Canada invalided patents for interactive program guide (“IPG”) technology and clarified a reasonable royalty as the appropriate remedy had the patents been found valid and infringed. Therefore, Rovi’s patents were natural developments or obvious extensions.

article thumbnail

How the New USPTO Pre-Application Assessment Program Only Reinforces the Need for Integrated & Intelligent Patent Evaluation Software

IP.com

Over the last decade, the total annual patent applications submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) each year is over 600,000 applications. The fastest patent review process time is 6-12 months if fast-tracked via Track One , with the average taking up to 22 months.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Keeping up with Belgian patent litigation: Year case law review 2021

The IPKat

Over to our Belgian Katfriends : " While 2022 is in full swing with high levels of business in the Belgian courts, 2021 was a quieter year for patent litigators in Belgium. 25 EPC, and the disappearance of the cautio iudicatum solvi that was sometimes required from foreign plaintiffs launching (patent) proceedings in Belgium.

article thumbnail

Patentability Search of Software in India

IP and Legal Filings

A patent is an intellectual property right granted by a government to the inventor, to protect their invention and allow the fullest commercial exploitation of the patented invention. Importantly, only those who have developed new technologies and created a product can file for a patent on the new technology.

Patent 52
article thumbnail

Conference Posters and Materials: Beware! They Can Constitute Prior Art

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

Unfortunately, what is good for the sharing of information is often not good for the patenting of inventions that arise from the research and products presented at these conferences. The poster, together with information found in other sources of prior art, were enough to find the patent claims in question obvious and invalid.

Art 52
article thumbnail

Orange Book 101

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

One of the most significant breakthroughs on this front was the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, which established a regulatory framework whereby generic versions of brand-name drugs could enter the market immediately upon the expiration of brand-name drugs’ patents. Patents covering the listed drugs, as well as their expiration dates.

article thumbnail

Likely confusion alone justifies liability but not damages or profits in exercise equipment case

43(B)log

When Max Rack’s last patent expired, however, Core Health decided to compete against Max Rack by selling an identical machine under a new name—the ‘Freedom Rack.’” So a lot of interesting discussion of what suffices for a profits and damages award. Max Rack invented a piece of gym equipment, the Max Rack.