Remove terms-of-use
article thumbnail

Bombshell Ruling Puts Amendments to Click-Wrap and Terms of Use Agreements in Question

IP Tech Blog

Given the complete lack of evidence of notice within Defendant’s service itself, Plaintiff’s ongoing use of the service is irrelevant to determining whether he had actual or constructive notice of the post-2011 terms of service. Defendant’s argument misses the point. The case is Sifuentes v. Dropbox, Inc. 2022 WL 2673080, *4 (N.D.

Contracts 113
article thumbnail

Copyright Law Preempting Contractual Terms of Use

Patently-O

At some point, Genius began to suspect that Google was using the lyrics from its service and set-up some test cases that proved their suspicion. The complaint asserts breach of contract based upon violation of its terms of service; unfair competition (based upon state law); and unjust enrichment. by Dennis Crouch. 17 U.S.C. §

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Rethinking Tech Contract Terms For Governance Of AI Use

IP Law 360

Traditional considerations in technology deals are often inadequate for governing artificial intelligence use, which means lawyers should revisit and reimagine existing terms across the full spectrum of relevant contracts, ranging from procurement agreements and data licenses to customer agreements, say Marina Aronchik and Samuel Hartman at Mayer Brown. (..)

article thumbnail

To Manage Generative AI Risk, Understand the Terms of Use

JD Supra Law

Most systems do not protect sensitive information used in prompts, and users bear most of the risk of using generative AI systems and outputs. Generative AI systems use the information provided in prompts — along with the data that the systems were trained on — to create outputs. By: Goodwin

98
article thumbnail

Bombshell Ruling Puts Amendments to Click-Wrap and Terms of Use Agreements in Question

LexBlog IP

Given the complete lack of evidence of notice within Defendant’s service itself, Plaintiff’s ongoing use of the service is irrelevant to determining whether he had actual or constructive notice of the post-2011 terms of service. Defendant’s argument misses the point. The case is Sifuentes v. Dropbox, Inc.

article thumbnail

What’s in a Name?: Third Party Use of a Descriptive Term Without Secondary Meaning Can Undermine Assertions of Substantially Exclusive Use of the Term

JD Supra Law

Summary: Evidence of use of a term even without a showing of secondary meaning, by any third party, is relevant to demonstrate that an assertion of substantially exclusive use was false. Before: Moore, Prost, Taranto. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. By: Knobbe Martens

article thumbnail

Metaverse users must read terms of use or risk losing IP

Managing IP

Counsel say the laws of various countries will dictate whether IP rights can be transferred through terms of use, among other things

IP 52