Remove topics admissible-evidence
article thumbnail

ISP Surprises Record Labels with ‘Innocent Infringer’ Witness at Piracy Trial

TorrentFreak

The “repeat infringer” issue remains a hot topic in US courts and over the years several ISPs have been sued because of them. In anticipation, both parties submitted motions to exclude several topics, with partial success. No Innocent Infringer Evidence? As such, evidence from that case could be relevant here.

article thumbnail

The Board has no Time to Waste: TTAB Highlights Importance of Correctly Submitting and Categorizing Evidence in Proceedings

LexBlog IP

Instead, the TTAB focused primarily on the evidence submitted by RLP, specifically, that much of it was erroneously submitted under seal or improperly authenticated by Notice of Reliance. Moral of this opposition proceeding: follow the TTAB’s procedural rules for submission of evidence, authentication, foundation, and confidentiality.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Cal. appeals court affirms use of statistical sampling to calculate # of FAL/UCL violations in AG action

43(B)log

Despite Ashford’s knowledge of these facts, defendants “created a high-pressure admissions department whose ‘north star’ was enrollment numbers rather than truthful advising. Ashford called its salespeople “admissions counselors” and trained them to build trust and rapport with prospective students.

article thumbnail

when can pharma experts testify about compliance with the FDCA? (also some survey stuff)

43(B)log

Imprimis’s trademark survey expert (for secondary meaning) didn’t use a control group, but that went to weight rather than admissibility in the absence of other serious problems. Whether this control adequately accounted for noise went to weight rather than admissibility. Defendants’ proposed expert on the same topic got in too.

article thumbnail

OneSubsea IP UK Ltd. v. FMC Tech., Inc., No. 22-1099 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses the proper standard for an appeal of a discretionary decision by a successor judge as well as requests for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and certain circumstances that do not make a case exceptional. FMC’s accused device]. Exceptional Case Findings Under 35 U.S.C. §

IP 130
article thumbnail

Record Labels and ISP Bright House go to Trial over Pirating Subscribers

TorrentFreak

Excluding Evidence From Trial. Specifically, the ISP and music companies both wanted to limit what evidence and arguments the other side can present to the jury. Limited Piracy Admissions. Finally, Bright House’s motion to prevent the labels from using piracy “admissions” from the ISPs subscribers were granted.

Music 131
article thumbnail

Unvaccinated Parents Risk Losing Parenting Time

Nelligan Law

Parents who don’t give consent to vaccinate their child may find that the courts will order that their consent is not required, unless they can overcome that presumption with valid medical evidence. The requirement to offset the presumption of vaccination is other persuasive medical evidence – that meets the threshold of admissibility.