Remove topics consumer-confusion
article thumbnail

Scalping consumers

Likelihood of Confusion

Private-label branding is a huge topic, and a very interesting one. The post Scalping consumers appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. I wrote a huge post about it here, focusing on Hellman’s (or, for you westerners, Best Foods) mayonnaise lookalikes.

article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Are Gummy Vitamins Related to Personal Care Products Under Section 2(d)?

The TTABlog

The Board was not impressed, pointing out once again that: “[the] likelihood of confusion determination must be made on the basis of the goods or services as identified in the application and the registration, rather than on the basis of what the evidence might show the applicant’s or registrant’s actual goods or services to be.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 2 (Trademarks)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Topics of conversation ranged from innocuous to serious, encompassing posts about parents discussing their own children, snow days and school closures, the school calendar, criticisms and concerns regarding District employees, and allegations that a District principal threatened a student. Atlas Biologicals, Inc. Domain Admim/Sitetools, Inc.,

article thumbnail

keyword ads, product names not confusing in ex-roommate spat

43(B)log

Boost alleged a “couple dozen” confusion instances, but didn’t have memorialized evidence thereof. The court found the imagination test for descriptiveness “inconclusive” “to determine whether consumers would require a mental leap to understand that BoostLash refers to an eyelash growth serum.” Actual confusion: No record evidence.

article thumbnail

Recommended Reading: Professors Farley and Ramsey: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression"

The TTABlog

Ramsey of the University of San Diego School of Law have just published an article on a very timely topic: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression," 72 American University Law Review 1179 (2023). Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University - Washington College of Law, and Professor Lisa P.

article thumbnail

Form “Non-Disparagement” Clause Violated Consumer Review Fairness Act–State v. Ideal Horizon Benefits

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2016, Congress enacted the Consumer Review Fairness Act (CRFA), which bans businesses from trying to contractually restrict their customers’ reviews. The post Form “Non-Disparagement” Clause Violated Consumer Review Fairness Act–State v. ” Case citation : State v.

article thumbnail

Cardozo A&ELJ symposium, Trademark

43(B)log

Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademark law. That is, Rogers is for uses that might confuse, but not about source.