Remove topics de-minimis-claims
article thumbnail

Copyright Office Guidance on AI

Intellectual Property Law Blog

AI-generated content that is more than de minimis should be explicitly excluded from the application. Applicants should not list an AI technology or the company that provided it as an author or co-author simply because they used it when creating their work.

Copyright 246
article thumbnail

Take-Two Tattoo Trial Begins: What You Need to Know

Copyright Lately

Defendants Can’t Assert a De Minimis Defense at Trial. Not only has the liability phase of trial been essentially reduced to affirmative defenses, but defendants won’t actually be able to assert one of their key defenses at trial—that Take-Two’s use of Orton’s tattoos was de minimis.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Copyright Office Guidance on AI

LexBlog IP

AI-generated content that is more than de minimis should be explicitly excluded from the application. Applicants should not list an AI technology or the company that provided it as an author or co-author simply because they used it when creating their work.

article thumbnail

US Copyright Office Guidance on AI-Generated Works

LexBlog IP

The USCO has had to consider the application of established copyright law principles to AI-generated works in light of an increase in applications claiming copyright in such works. By way of example, an applicant who incorporates AI-generated text into a larger work should claim the portions of the text that the human authored.

article thumbnail

Copyright Office Guidance on AI

LexBlog IP

AI-generated content that is more than de minimis should be explicitly excluded from the application. Applicants should not list an AI technology or the company that provided it as an author or co-author simply because they used it when creating their work.

article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Is CALIHEMP Geographically Descriptive of Skin Care Products?

The TTABlog

The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark CALIHEMP for “skin and body topical lotions, creams, oils, balms and salves for cosmetic use, all of the foregoing containing hemp oil extract containing hemp ingredients solely derived from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahyrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 Double entendre?

article thumbnail

ChatUSG: What Companies Doing Business with the Government Need to Know About Artificial Intelligence

Intellectual Property Law Blog

This Guidance covers some important topics. AI-generated content that is more than de minimis should be explicitly excluded from the application. Does using the output of an AI code generator subject the developer and/or user to infringement claims?