topics department-of-health-and-human-services-hhs 
LexBlog IP
SEPTEMBER 24, 2022
The objective of the Executive Order is to “coordinate a whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing towards innovative solutions in health, climate change, energy, food security, agriculture, supply chain resilience, and national and economic security.” ” Data Initiative.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 20, 2023
Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Proposed Rule) that seeks to enhance safeguards of reproductive health care information through changes to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. On April 12, 2023, the U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 9, 2024
This post was co-authored by Yelena Greenberg , a member Robinson+Cole’s Health Law Group. HHS is now proposing to scale back those rules slightly, in accordance with statutory changes to federal law governing the privacy of SUD records in the 2020 “CARES Act” legislation enacted in response to COVID-19.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 1, 2022
Key proposed changes align the use and disclosure of Part 2 treatment records with the HIPAA requirements, as follows: Disclosure: A single patient consent given once for all future uses and disclosures for treatment, payment, and health care operations (TPO) of Part 2 records. Comments are being accepted for 60 days from publication.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
JANUARY 11, 2022
Introduction. 2021 saw several important milestones in the biosimilars space, including the much anticipated first interchangeable designations by FDA and the approval of the first ophthalmology biosimilar. The biosimilar market also exhibited continued growth, with multiple biosimilar developers reporting strong sales of biosimilars through 2021.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 15, 2023
The Fifth Circuit ruled that some government agencies unconstitutionally coerced or encouraged social media services to remove constitutionally protected speech, and it enjoined those agencies from ongoing censorship. The opinion was a major and potentially troubling development in Internet Law, so I planned to blog it. (It’s
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content