Remove topics employment-discrimination
article thumbnail

Comparing the Labour legislation Maternity Benefits Act, 1961 (India) VS. Family and Medical Leave Act of the USA

IP and Legal Filings

In order to guarantee employment safety and support for employees during maternity, paternity, and family-related conditions, two historic pieces of legislation—the Maternity Benefit Act of 1961 in India and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) in the USA— were passed.

Law 87
article thumbnail

Nevada Seeks to Ban Non-Competes with Physicians

Trading Secrets

The relevant text proscribes noncompetition covenants which “restrict a provider of health care employed by or contracted with a hospital in [Nevada] from providing medical services at another medical facility or office during or after the term of the employment or contract.” As indicated, section 7.8

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

[Video] Williams Mullen Manufacturing Edge Video Series - Episode 1

JD Supra Law

By: Williams Mullen

Law 52
article thumbnail

Nevada Seeks to Ban Non-Competes with Physicians

LexBlog IP

The relevant text proscribes noncompetition covenants which “restrict a provider of health care employed by or contracted with a hospital in [Nevada] from providing medical services at another medical facility or office during or after the term of the employment or contract.” As indicated, section 7.8

article thumbnail

ChatUSG: What Companies Doing Business with the Government Need to Know About Artificial Intelligence

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released a joint statement on “Enforcement Efforts Against Discrimination and Bias in Automated Systems.” Algorithmic Discrimination Protections : Individuals should not face discrimination by algorithms, and systems should be developed and utilized in an equitable manner.

article thumbnail

Disparate impact isn't "unfair" for consumer protection purposes, court indicates

43(B)log

May 18, 2021) This would make a great student note topic: Is disparate impact “unfair” under state consumer protection laws? But, the court reasoned, “Schulte mistakes gender-based marketing for gender discrimination. Conopco, Inc., 20-2696 (8 h Cir. The court here implicitly says no, without ever confronting the question directly.

article thumbnail

ChatUSG: What Companies Doing Business with the Government Need to Know About Artificial Intelligence

LexBlog IP

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released a joint statement on “Enforcement Efforts Against Discrimination and Bias in Automated Systems.” Algorithmic Discrimination Protections : Individuals should not face discrimination by algorithms, and systems should be developed and utilized in an equitable manner.