Remove topics extrinsic-evidence
article thumbnail

TTABlog Test: Are Gummy Vitamins Related to Personal Care Products Under Section 2(d)?

The TTABlog

Examining Attorney Yat Sye Lee submitted internet evidence that some eighteen different companies offer the goods of both applicant and registrant under the same mark (including SEPHORA, BATH & BODY WORKS, and PACIFICA), along with twenty use-based third-party registrations covering these goods. In re Salvation Nutraceuticals Inc.

article thumbnail

Recent Summary Judgment Decision in FleetCor Case Spells Trouble for CEOs and Disclaimers

LexBlog IP

It is not every day that the FTC sues the CEO of a publicly traded company, and it is even less often that we see a federal court opinion on the topic, so this decision warrants a deep dive. Background. But before we focus on the decision, we need to get some unusually messy procedural history tied to the AMG decision out of the way.

article thumbnail

(c) infringement and false advertising claims against addiction treatment competitor survive, in part

43(B)log

Other statements dismissed as puffery: “ ‘Exceed the expectations of our clients’, ‘World Class’ and ‘Unlike any other in Northern California.’ ” as well as statements that defendants use “evidence based methods.” The court need not engage in the application of the intrinsic test in considering a motion to dismiss.”