Remove topics graffiti
article thumbnail

Book review: Copyright in the street. An Oral History of Creative Processes in Street Art and Graffiti Subcultures

The IPKat

An Oral History of Creative Processes in Street Art and Graffiti Subcultures ”, authored by Enrico Bonadio (City University of London). As its title suggests, this book focuses on the relationship between US copyright law and street art and graffiti. The second chapter is entitled “Creativity and originality of graffiti lettering”.

Art 57
article thumbnail

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

The IPKat

An Oral History of Creative Processes in Street Art and Graffiti Subcultures’ authored by Enrico Bonadio. The reviewed considered the focus of the book, namely the evolution of US copyright law and street art graffiti. Book reviews Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot reviewed the book ‘Copyright in the Street.

Art 57
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Sunday Surprises

The IPKat

The event is designed to encourage interactive discussions among participants through panel debates, with each of them covering 4 or 5 key topics related to each specific sector. and Copyright in Graffiti and Street Art). Registration is open and more details can be found here. closing dinner), IP Lunches (incl.

article thumbnail

Fleshing out the copyright in a tattoo

IP Whiteboard

Another topic which has leads a rabbit hole is the question of moral rights. Also, another interesting concept is moral rights in graffiti art. If a client pays a tattoo artist to create a tattoo and ink this on to the body, it seems like this would constitute conduct to create an implied licence. What about moral rights? 1] [link]. [2]

article thumbnail

City Government Can’t Remove Off-Topic Comments to Its Social Media Account–Kimsey v. Sammamish

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This lawsuit involves the first rule, which restricts off-topic comments. ” As evidence, the plaintiffs pointed to other off-topic comments that hadn’t been removed. The off-topic rule is, by definition, a content-based restriction on speech. This injunction only applies to the “off-topic” rule.