Remove topics improper-venue
article thumbnail

Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Snap moved to transfer venues and to dismiss asserting the patents were invalid for being directed to a patent-ineligible abstract idea under Alice.

Invention 130
article thumbnail

Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101

LexBlog IP

Topic This case addresses patent eligibility under Alice and whether the district court should have afforded the patent owner leave to amend its complaint. Snap moved to transfer venues and to dismiss asserting the patents were invalid for being directed to a patent-ineligible abstract idea under Alice.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court February 2022

Patently-O

The Kessler Doctrine : If you want to really dig into this case, please read my article on the topic that I wrote for an Akron Law review IP symposium issue. When the defendants attempted to transfer venue to N.D.Cal., the patentee explained that district would not be proper under the venue statute 1400(b). Daktronics, Inc.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court on Patent Law for October 2022

Patently-O

Topics: Enablement / Written Description (All three are biotech / pharma): 3 Cases; Infringement (FDA Labeling): 1 Case; Anticipation (On Sale Bar): 1 Case; Double Patenting (Still the law?) Here, the mandamus focused on transfer for inconvenient venue under Section 1404(a). Everyone agrees that issue is not patent law specific.

article thumbnail

IPR And Metaverse

IP and Legal Filings

Recently a British women named Nina Jane Patel accused a group of men and alleged that she was sexually harassed by them in Horizon Venues of Meta. Other times, though, the improper use of trademarks in the Metaverse is hotly contested. Rockstar Videos, Inc, et al.,

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit: Elected Officials Violated the First Amendment by Blocking Constituents on Social Media–Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

. “Alternatively, the Trustees could have established and enforced clear rules of etiquette for public comments on their pages, including rules against lengthy, repetitive, or off-topic comments.” City Government Can’t Remove Off-Topic Comments From Its Social Media Page–Kimsey v. Ziegenhorn.