Remove topics intel
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions

Intellectual Property Law Blog

ParkerVision sued Intel for infringement of the ’444 Patent and Intel filed a request for an IPR. Intel moved to exclude these new arguments from ParkerVision’s sur-reply, which the Board granted. ParkerVision, Inc., Katherin K. Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for IP and USPTO Director No. 2022-1548, (Fed.

Inventor 130
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions

LexBlog IP

ParkerVision sued Intel for infringement of the ’444 Patent and Intel filed a request for an IPR. Intel’s reply also provided a proposed construction not limiting “storage element” to being part of an energy transfer system. ParkerVision, Inc., Katherin K. 2022-1548, (Fed.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Patent Law at the Supreme Court February 2022

Patently-O

Intel’s IPR petition was denied under the NHK-Fintiv Rule that permits the PTAB to deny institution of otherwise sufficient IPRs based upon the existence of ongoing parallel litigation involving the same patent and parties. One more is still pending – Intel Corporation v. ” Eligibility : American Axle v.

article thumbnail

Cartel Intel: Interview with Ashley Brickles, Senior Managing Director at FTI Consulting

Herbert Smith Freehills

As part of our quarterly Cartel Intel series, Herbert Smith Freehills' Brussels partner Daniel Vowden sat down with Ashley Brickles, (Senior Managing Director at FTI Consulting) to discuss the latest EMEA cartel developments. Our quarterly update on cartel developments, Cartel Intel, is available here. . Hero Image: 33496.

Editing 52
article thumbnail

Is “A Change [] Gonna Come”?: Music Publishers Sue AI Startup Anthropic for Copyright Infringement

LexBlog IP

Ross Intel. ” Id. at ¶ 10. For example, in response to a prompt asking Claude to write poetry in the style of Lynyrd Skynyrd, Claude “responds by providing a nearly word-for-word copy of the lyrics to ‘Sweet Home Alabama,’ in violation of Universal’s rights[.]” ” Id. at ¶ 78.

Music 52
article thumbnail

The 14th Public Commission Meeting – Dark Patterns, Imposter Rulemaking and Yet Another Policy Statement

LexBlog IP

There’s no intel on where he is going, but campaigning for his slot has apparently already commenced. Back to the meeting – and we will start with the dark patterns discussion because we keep hearing about this topic. ” (And as a disclaimer, one of us gave closing remarks at the workshop.)

Designs 52
article thumbnail

Making a Proper Determination of Obviousness

Patently-O

Quoting Intel Corp. This new guidance avoids that topic and instead instructs examiners on how to marshal their evidence to establish a prima facie case of obviousness. .’ To be sure, the Federal Circuit continues to use the word ‘motivation’ in its obviousness jurisprudence. Qualcomm Inc., 4th 784 (Fed.

Art 121