Remove topics judicial-appointments
article thumbnail

As Judiciary Committee Votes, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson Responds to Tillis on IP and Antitrust

IP Watchdog

Supreme Court, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) submitted a number of questions for the record, including 35 IP-related questions on topics ranging from patent eligibility to anti-suit injunctions and 15 antitrust questions, to which Judge Jackson recently responded. While Tillis voted against Judge Jackson’s appointment to the U.S.

IP 119
article thumbnail

Event Report: BIE Symposium raises questions on Arrow declarations in the UPC

The IPKat

It was perfect opportunity for patent litigators and attorneys to ask their burning questions to a panel comprising of appointed Dutch UPC judges and a member of the drafting committee of the Rules of Procedure (RoP). After this, they discussed a set of various topics related to the RoP and the Agreement on the Unified Patent Court (UPCA).

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Announcing the SpicyIP Inaugural Doctoral Fellow!

SpicyIP

Considering that IP disputes often involve technical subject matters, different High Courts have accommodated provisions for appointing independent subject matter experts and also allow parties to file affidavits in evidence by their respective experts to assist the Court in understanding the nitty-gritty of the subject matter IP.

article thumbnail

Role of Independent Director: In Era of Corporate Governance

IP and Legal Filings

Over the course of the late 1980s and early 1990s, unethical business activities and dubious corporate policies plagued the global corporate sector, giving rise to the topic of corporate governance. The goal of appointing independent directors would be defeated if this really limited their effectiveness and hampered their “independence.”

article thumbnail

A patent small claims court – what do you think?

Patently-O

Given ongoing interest in the topic, USPTO has engaged ACUS to conduct. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. topics, whether there is a need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility. Opportunities for administrative and/or judicial review of small claims. 18, 2012)).

Patent 111
article thumbnail

Patent Case Management Goes Cross-Institutional and Global

Patently-O

Menell, Koret Professor of Law; Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology; Faculty Director, Berkeley Judicial Institute; University of California at Berkeley School of Law. In conjunction with Eun-Joo Min, Director of the WIPO Judicial Institute, and Judge (ret.) Guest post by Peter S.

Patent 67
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Augusts” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

He wrote detailed posts on this topic later here and here. Talking about this topic, the issue of Judicial Recusals also shouldn’t be left untouched – an issue that has been the heart of several IP controversies, notably the Novartis dispute. One troubling issue with the MHRD Chairs was the opaqueness of its functioning.

IP 105