Remove topics misleading-statements
article thumbnail

Facebook Defeats Lawsuit Over Its Fact-Checking Explanations–Stossel v. Meta

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Facebook added a “missing context” legend that said “[i]ndependent fact-checkers say this information is missing context and could mislead people.” Specifically, with respect to the Fire Video, he claims that Facebook imputed a fact statement to the video that he didn’t make. The second video, “Are We Doomed?,”

article thumbnail

ESG statements are commercial speech excluded from California's anti-SLAPP law

43(B)log

She alleged that its statements about “regenerative farming”; its ESG commitments; and “preserving natural resources” were “false, deceptive, and misleading.” It did not matter whether the challenged statements were made specifically for the purpose of promoting defendant’s sales. The communication as a whole was the key.

Law 72
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Recommended Reading: Professors Farley and Ramsey: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression"

The TTABlog

Ramsey of the University of San Diego School of Law have just published an article on a very timely topic: "Raising the Threshold for Trademark Infringement to Protect Free Expression," 72 American University Law Review 1179 (2023). Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University - Washington College of Law, and Professor Lisa P.

article thumbnail

A green slogan is not a trademark, says the General Court

The IPKat

The term is a compound word modelled on the verb “whitewash” and can be defined as a market or public relations process by an organisation to give a misleading image of ecological responsibility. This information can be in some cases confusing or misleading. Photo courtesy of Luisa Callini and Minou.

Trademark 132
article thumbnail

Battle of the experts: court deals with surveys, damages, other Lanham Act experts

43(B)log

The test group saw homepage statements regarding FDA involvement in Tru Niagen, including the phrases “3 FDA Safety Notifications” and “reviewed and accepted by. whether the stimulus conveyed anything about safety), Isaacson’s survey “asked a more leading question by framing a particular proposition or statement (e.g.,

article thumbnail

Is disgorgement the new normal in Lanham Act cases?

43(B)log

Plaintiff argued that it should have been able to use the testimony of its principal, but even during deposition, plaintiff’s counsel stated that he “was not [there] to talk about causation and damages” and objected to questions directed to him about damages, declaring that this topic would be exclusively “within the scope of expert opinion.”

article thumbnail

UK Regulator Issues New Guidance on In-Game Advertising

IP Tech Blog

Statements such as “cheapest” should refer to the overall price, rather than the price per unit. Given this may mislead consumers into making a transactional decision that they otherwise would not have done had they received more information, developers should take extra care to not mislead gamers. Practical Advice.