Remove topics noninfringement
article thumbnail

U Mass v L’Oréal: Avoiding indefiniteness through claim construction

Patently-O

UMass’s claimed invention is a topical skin care product containing adenosine that is applied to the skin. Panel: Prost, Mayer, Taranto (author). This opinion nominally addressing indefiniteness illustrates the power of de novo claim construction review at the Federal Circuit. bracketed numbers and emphasis added).

article thumbnail

OneSubsea IP UK Ltd. v. FMC Tech., Inc., No. 22-1099 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2023)

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Topic This case addresses the proper standard for an appeal of a discretionary decision by a successor judge as well as requests for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § FMC used the District Court’s claim construction as the basis for a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, which OneSubsea opposed.

IP 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Artists Attack AI: Why The New Lawsuit Goes Too Far

Copyright Lately

If you’re interested in doing a deeper dive into how all of this works, I recommend following Andres Guadamuz’s blog on the topic.) There’s no “cutting and pasting” involved. (If Notably, in 1984’s “Betamax” opinion, Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios , the U.S.

article thumbnail

OneSubsea IP UK Ltd. v. FMC Tech., Inc., No. 22-1099 (Fed. Cir. May 23, 2023)

LexBlog IP

Topic This case addresses the proper standard for an appeal of a discretionary decision by a successor judge as well as requests for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § ” FMC used the District Court’s claim construction as the basis for a motion for summary judgment of noninfringement, which OneSubsea opposed. .”

IP 52
article thumbnail

Does Transformative Matter? No, At Least Where Use Is Commercial

LexBlog IP

These were the hot topics in the recently decided Supreme Court case of Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. AWF then sued Goldsmith in the Southern District of New York for a declaratory judgment of noninfringement. Andy Warhol. And Prince, the Purple One. (Or Or in this case, Orange.) Goldsmith et al. ,

article thumbnail

India’s High Court of Delhi issues guidance on SEP licensing that seeks to harmonize decisions in other countries (Intex v. Ericsson)

LexBlog IP

This decision addresses many hot topics in licensing SEPs and attempts to harmonize existing decisions in reaching its rulings here.The Court here, for example, discussed the following topics: There is some dispute about whether a FRAND commitment imposes obligations on someone wanting to license an SEP.

article thumbnail

Biosimilars 2021 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

The letter discusses the BPCIA and the Hatch-Waxman Act frameworks (for small molecule drugs) and sets forth several topics for USPTO’s consideration and further discussion: engagement between FDA and USPTO to increase efficiencies, possible misuse of the patent system (e.g.,